- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
This is disbarment worthy
Seriously. Only 5k? After doubling down on the lie? They should never work in law again.
If it was intentional and they knew it was bogus, sure. But without looking at the details, I’m guessing they asked ChatGPT for case references and didn’t fact check their results. Negligent, yes, but apparently not to the level to require disbarment.
See the video linked above.
The initial use of ChatGPT was negligent, but they subsequently attempted to cover up what they did and lied to the judge, so, pretty terrible overall
Absolutely too small of a punishment
These guys did 0 work in fact checking a system that is known to hallucinate
This video explains what happened in detail. It is hilarious.
Great video! Thanks
“Oh, we’re so sorry! We just couldn’t imagine a tool created to make shit up would actually make shit up instead of quoting verbatim ]judicial precedent/case law/whatever jargon]! Also we accidentally lied and unintentionally refused to perform our actual roles as required by, y’know, normal procedure and/or law like a real law firm with real lawyers in it. Whoopsy! Totally cool, though, right?”
