• wowohwowza@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    £50m is far too much, but I do think ESR is a great player that deserves more playtime. He was explosive at the end of the 21/22 season, such a great super sub.

  • RafaSquared@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think he’s quite a good player but don’t see where he’ll fit in at Newcastle. Surely that money could be spent better elsewhere.

  • MiguelAlmiron@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I know, still think Trippier Bruno and Isak are far more important this season than Gordon. You can have an off game for Gordon and still win, an off game for Bruno means a loss.

    • Right_Wear3800@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      People have been calling for Bruno to be dropped up until the last couple of games. Trips is absolutely essential though, no doubt.

      Isak is hugely talented, but it’s not like Wilson hasn’t been scoring.

  • Comrade-Conrad-4@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Arsenal have to get him starting more. At least in cup matches. Unless Arteta really is taking his time with him because of the long term injury.

  • robstrosity@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Considering the price for Gordon was 40-45m then 50m is really good value. That’s a fair comparison as they play similar roles and are both English. ESR is better than Gordon. The only real worry would be his injury record but if he can stay fit then 50m is more than fair.

  • Ajax_Trees@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I thought this would be a cut price deal if arsenal wanted rid. 50 mill really wouldn’t be value

  • sheikh_n_bake@alien.topOPB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes plenty of competent teams have struggled at SJP.

    Aston Villa, Tottenham, Brighton, Manchester United, Man City, Arsenal have all been beaten at SJP since the takeover.

  • AutoModerator@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    To reduce the spam of reports regarding the same move during transfer windows we try to allow only one submission about each transfer saga per day. The submission in question also needs to contain relevant new information regarding the potential move, and not just being a “no/minor developments” report.

    If there are important/official developments or new valuable information about a saga, we will allow extra threads in the same day, but for the rest of minor news please just comment them as a reply to this comment. Please help us reporting unnecessary threads for being duplicates.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

  • kl08pokemon@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Smith Rowe isn’t a bad player but surely there’s better value for money elsewhere? It’s not like they’re in desperate need of HG players

    • sheikh_n_bake@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      We love English players clearly.

      Signed Gordon, Hall, Livramento, Barnes, Pope, Ashby, Burn, Trippier, Targett alone since the takeover.

  • TheGoldenPineapples@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It has been suggested that Arsenal value Smith Rowe at around £50m, but FFP rules would almost certainly force Newcastle to be creative when it came to putting together a deal for the attacking midfielder.

    Yeah, I don’t see us budging on that and I don’t see Newcastle paying it either.