• TehPers@beehaw.orgEnglish
    5·
    1 day ago

    At first, I misread this thinking a single 5c dragon was enough to win the game with this. Needing 5 dragons is a lot though (especially with the color restrictions).

    The other effects are nice, but this enchantment is just too expensive imo. Indestructible doesn’t do much when exile-based removal is so common, and the +1/+1 counters are too slow to come out and not worth the mana.

    Maybe some deck finds a way to combo with this, but needing to untap with 5 dragons and not already be winning the game is going to be tough.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.todayEnglish
      2·
      20 hours ago

      Definitely a “Win More” card, I see it mainly being used for the indestructible more than the win condition & the +1/+1 is minimal.

    • Evu@mtgzone.comEnglish
      1·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, if you control five dragons, I like your chances of winning the game with or without this enchantment. But that’s not a complaint. This card has good flavor and I’m sure will be popular even if it’s not entirely necessary.

  • nonprofitparrot@lemmy.worldEnglish
    5·
    1 day ago

    Indestructible is huge! 5c cards can be cool but the commander rules really put a damper on them. This is good in like… 2 or 3 decks?

    • MysticKetchup@mtgzone.comOPEnglish
      2·
      18 hours ago

      Ur-Dragon, Scion of the Ur-Dragon, Tiamat, maybe Ramos Dragon Engine and Morophon. I guess Changeling typal decks enjoy this

  • bradsmybro@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
    4·
    1 day ago

    More nonsense for my ur dragon deck. It is likely not good especially since you generally will be skipping playing a creature to play it while also putting a giant target on your head. But I’ll be playing it anyway.