• the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Knowing microsoft it will be some locked down proprietary bullshit. The reason the steam deck is successful is because it’s wide open to do with as you please from the get go.

  • k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Forgetting the impending branded PC based handheld…

    It will be interesting to see how MS/Xbox handle a handheld console. They have such an opportunity here, but it will be easy for them to squander.

    What they might do: Another Xbox "branded’ PC gaming handheld with no xbox game compatibility except for streaming xbox games. This would be a loss and might only peak mild interest, depending on what UI/wrapper they use to launch games and how seamless it makes the process. I dont have faith but hey… Valve did it.

    What they should do: At least - it should play native xbox games and be backwards compatible like a series s, just mobile. It also needs the ability to dock to a TV like a steamdeck. Thats it. These things would make the console viable imo. Bonus - if it has any pc game compatibility whatsoever.

    The Big issue: Clearly microsoft likes money, and their subscriptions are what make them their money. Seemingly, xbox would like to merge their PC and XBox libraries to be playable on one device which would make them much more desirable and competitive in the gaming space…

    What is preventing that most of all, is subscription based multiplayer.

    I dont see how xbox could ever give up that huge subscription base to appease fans and achieve parity between console and PC with free multiplayer. I also dont see them having success charging players to play multiplayer PC games on an xbox console, not with their current market share. Having both multiplayer models exist on one device would be convoluted and sure to enrage users.

    Logic then leads me to the only real conclusion… Xbox games will remain locked behind subscription models and consoles with subscription based multiplayer.

    Imo releasing a PC-native-games only handheld is what will prevent the success of the handheld. We will see how Xbox plays their cards, but odds are they make some short-sighted financial decisions here that handicaps their reception, as usual.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Microsoft will almost certainly come up with a short sighted approach. They are not a company that has experience with real competition and they are used to dictating the rules to the market.

      • k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Yeah there is no way in hell they are giving up that subscription money.

        It makes me wonder if they are developing some pc based xbox compatibility launcher, that would allow pc’s to play xbox games, but still compartmentalize their subscription audience…

        Tbh i fear that xbox and its game library are going to be forgotten about, and left to rot. Even with xbox’s backwards compatibility pushes over the years, they have dug themselves into a hole with their subscriptions.

        Xbox wants to believe that the future of games is subscription based, and for them it can be, i just dont anticipate them being market leader doing that until they start releasing must-play games.

        As somebody who has dropped A LOT of money to “own” xbox digital games(rather their licenses)… I will definitely feel slighted if thats their future. I somewhat already do.