• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Here’s where it falls apart, right here:

    [Vladimir Putin] also said the increased use of BRICS national currencies for transactions will “minimize geopolitical risks.”

    Some of the BRICS countries have wildly volatile currencies either because of governments “printing money” to devalue their currency for economic stimulus for exports or to pay down debts. Alternatively straight up currency manipulation by the sovereign states issuing them. I would think this makes settling transactions in these local currencies a big risk for commerce. You don’t know if the value of the currency you accept tomorrow will be worth what it is today. These are reasons GBP, Euro, and USD are so valuable as currencies, they generally have pretty consistent values.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        Feel free to post the alternate currency that was more stable for the history you’re showing. I’d wait, but I’d die waiting.

    • zante@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      How will this be any worse on BRICS Clear than it currently is on Swift ?

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        How will this be any worse on BRICS Clear than it currently is on Swift ?

        Lets say you’re Egypt selling cotton to Russia. BRICS Clear is pushing local currencies. So Russia wants to pay for the Egyptian cotton in Russian Rubles. Lets say the amount of Rubles would buy 10,000 barrels of crude oil at the time of settlement. Russia is currently in economic dire straights and the currency value is dropping. When Egypt wants to spend its Rubles, if it can find a country willing to take them, it could only buy 5,000 barrels of crude oil.

        How eager will Egypt be to settle another transaction in BRICS Clear when the value can evaporate. This is way international trade wants to settle in stable currencies.

        • zante@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Right, but there ways to mitigate that, without relying on the dollar and although they are not insignificant, they’ve surely considered them - the political benefits are huge for them.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            there ways to mitigate that, without relying on the dollar and although they are not insignificant,

            Sure, you can rely on other stable currencies like Euros or GBP. Alternatively you can rely on gold, but if you have the ability to trade your own currency to someone willing to accept it and give you sufficient gold, and that you can produce that gold on demand to buyers, you don’t really need a fiat currency except to facilitate transactions easier. The problem is these countries aren’t backing their currency with gold (or other precious metals).

            The tradeoff to gold backing is that you can’t grow your economy either. The amount of currency in circulation will always be limited by the ratio of gold you’re backing your currency with. This is why the USA abandoned the gold standard, and it was the right decisions. Before doing this, if you wanted to borrow money, you had to FIND someone with money that would be willing to lend it. There were instances of limits in growth simply because all the folks that held the vast majority of the wealth (and thereby gold backed currency) weren’t lending it, so loans couldn’t occur in volume.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I suspect they’re- Russia- trying to pull a fast one, and china is okay because it won’t hurt them.

      Maybe this gives Russians access to reserve currencies that are harder than the ruble.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean Russia is back to bartering for goods the Ruble is struggling so hard.

        I imagine the the reason China is ok with it is cause they view Russia as collateral that they can claim for their cheap labor force and supplies when they try to push their own economy out of so much manufacturing.

        Similar to what they are doing in Africa but with a closer contract to push on since it’s closer and easier to control.

      • Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        China is ok with it because they will insist the Renminbi be used as the brics reserve currency.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Didn’t the Euro even start as being pegged to the dollar at 1:1 to stabilize it in the beginning? Or am I misremembering?

      • Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, not the euro, but China did peg the Yuan to the dollar for years to ensure their exports remained cheap.

  • McDropout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Good for them for breaking North American hegemony.

    🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🙇‍♂️

    • Blackout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The only thing they’ve broken is their own economic growth. Alarms are going off in China particularly. Hard to make a recovery plan when government also controls the industry. Their last round of stimulus did absolutely nothing.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Not to mention, the other half is that they wouldn’t even be discussing this if Russia wasn’t being slowly economically strangled due to sanctions. And Russia wouldn’t be getting sanctioned if the hadn’t fucking invaded Ukraine proper in 2022.

      • McDropout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Without the dollar, no economic growth

        Sounds like a monopoly to me.

        I don‘t support monopolies.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Feel free to give me any of the dollars or dollar-backed currencies in your possession since you don’t support them. I’ll be happy to take them off your hands. I won’t even ask for a chicken or goat in trade.

          • McDropout@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I‘m so thankful that there are people like you on Lemmy who get it!

            Faith restored!

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You either support what you consider to be a monopoly, the U.S. dollar, or you don’t.

              If you don’t, you should clear your conscience by getting rid of it all. I’m just trying to help. You don’t want to be hypocritical, do you?

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Well I wouldn’t turn to Russia for economic growth. That’s for sure.

        • Blackout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Well you’re not going to replace it with a less trusted method. Ask any company that ran into China in the 90s whether they would do it again. I guarantee their version of this will be more restrictive and offer 0 protections for the businesses that use it. They all know the Chinese government just seizes whatever they want whenever they want it.

      • McDropout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I always say that Russia is committing war crimes so your point sir ?

        I am just criticizing how international law is selective.

      • McDropout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That‘s me.

        I am critical of Russia and United States of North America.

        Sue me, right?

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They already blocked you to keep their echo chamber pure.
          Cause if you can’t see people that disagree with you they don’t exist and you can be surprised and angry when things just don’t go your way.