Just like many other things that need to be revamped to reflect the massive disparity in resources, college admissions should absolutely contain criteria based on parents income. Since parents income plays a larger role in determining success than merit in the modern US at least, colleges could just admit based on test scores and grades within income levels and have a pyramid structure that mirrors the population rather than cream of the crop socioeconomic.
You can be white and poor as fuck and have almost all of the economic, educational and social disadvantages of a minority with the exception of skin color, which is exactly why the right wing has focused their messaging on poor, uneducated white folks as there are a shitload of them and they know our systems aren’t aimed to support and target them for aid, mostly because their disadvantages are economic. Despite having it better than minorities because they don’t face skin color discrimination, poor whites face many of the same challenges and Dems haven’t done much to help them in the last 40 years between NAFTA and the federal minimum wage not moving for the last 15 years.
I think colleges are scared to actually diversify (community colleges, city universities and some exceptions aside) because they know their rich, largely undiverse) donors would revolt.
Colleges and universities rely on being extremely overpriced and accessible to only the most wealthy candidates. Historically, the most expensive ones have always been “good ole boy” social clubs more than learning institutions. The proof is in the fact that a comparable degree program from a community school or even (Odin forbid) an online school cab land you the exact same job in any field except for law or politics, which are just the career version of good ole boy clubs anyway.
In other words: higher education is dying, and these institutions have no idea how to stay afloat in an economy where they are no longer the gatekeepers to socioeconomic mobility.
I like this article. This was a good read.
Strategy three (and therefore four) makes a lot of sense. Don’t compare all scores against the pool of every other score; but against other scores within the same context; to identify outliers within an environment. This controls for deviations between environments within the massive “took the sat” sample space.
This seems like a good idea, even if just from a statistical perspective.
If the demographics of the accepted population are different from the demographics of the sample space; then there must be something wrong / some bias within the acceptance process. Over-sampling the under-represented population never felt like the right solution to me. This seems much better.
Tldr: How to get as close to violating the civil rights act as possible without ending up in court again.
I really hope this shit gets shut down again, because their intent is to be racist again.
Or…to create a society where historic racism doesn’t get to define who holds wealth and power.
If that were the case, theyd like poor white people too.
Nah, this is just racism. Systemic racism at that.