I think this is a combination of inflation and employers wanting people to return to the office. I am excited for people to return to the office as it means I can earn a lot more money.
I’m never going back to the office. Working from home is convenient and doesn’t waste my time commuting, so I get more work done. All my startups have been remote as well; unless there’s something about your work that requires physical presence, office space is a waste of money.
The only people who want to argue with that are those who own commercial real estate. Maybe they should pick better investments instead of expecting us to bail them out 🤷
The only people who want to argue with that are those who own commercial real estate
Well, that isn’t true at all. I know many people who want to return who don’t own commercial real estate.
I work in sales and people in offices means more sales for me. Over the past six months, I have seen a large push for people to return and fewer jobs available for those who don’t want to return.
Strange, you claimed to be a doctor in another thread. Whatever, I didn’t say nobody wants to go back to the office, I said it’s unnecessary and a waste of money if your work doesn’t require physical presence.
Edit: actually, not whatever. I figured you for a liar and a shill months back since you spout nothing but GQP sound bites and don’t actually engage with what people say; you just went and proved it to my satisfaction. Enjoy your shiny new block 🤡
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Don’t forget to add self employed, and owns 3 houses (which are definitely for sure required for said self employed job, not a larp or house hoarding)
Oh I wish I was a fighter. Too bad my vision isn’t good enough. I had to settle doing other things.
I know imagine Michael Crichton. Author and medical doctor. Har har. Or Jonny Kim. Navy seal/astronaut and medical doctor.
Many people have just accomplished more than you have.
Removed by mod
I think I’ve seen wintermute claim to be in cyber software sales before. I missed where he was also a doctor.
Obviously, having blocked him, it’s hard to go check myself (also I’m at work - gotta earn that cheddar, we can’t all be doctor cyber software salesmen) but it was probably in this thread somewhere: https://lemmy.world/comment/6829461
I think that was the one where I first tried to engage with them, anyway.
Who is the GQP?
You don’t think inflation is causing companies to layoff and people to be concerned about losing their jobs?
There is nothing in the article that supports the headline. As far as I can tell, it’s just another way of saying ‘Americans are worry about the economy’.
I’m specifically worried about jobs, though. We need more jobs with better conditions and higher taxes on them. That sounds like a recipe for disaster, but that’s only true if we continue to allow the 1% to own more than the entire middle class. An excess of private wealth necessarily leads to an excess of public squalor.
An excess of private wealth necessarily leads to an excess of public squalor.
That isn’t true at all. The ultra-wealth, like Elon or Bezos, is not the reason you are poor. Their wealth is paper wealth.
Do you think Elon could convert his stock to that much cash? He can’t.
That isn’t true at all. The ultra-wealth, like Elon or Bezos, is not the reason you are poor. Their wealth is paper wealth.
For private individuals who cannot print money and cannot effect the rate that a government prints money, the economy is a zero sum game. So the rich hoarding wealth directly impacts and impoverishes the rest of us.
Do you think Elon could convert his stock to that much cash? He can’t.
Peepin made the claim, and supported it saying that the 1% own more than the entire middle class. You dismissed that, and demanded a high level of evidence for a different claim, the claim that [all the]* stock can be converted to cash.
But that wasn’t the original claim. Owning stock is still a form of owning wealth, even if it isn’t perfectly liquid. Peepin’s claims of the 1% owning more than the middle class is true.
So the rich hoarding wealth directly impacts and impoverishes the rest of us. Cite. That goes against every economic theory I have seen.
You dismissed that, and demanded a high level of evidence for a different claim, the claim that stock can be converted to cash.
How to say you don’t understand wealth or cash.
Cite. That goes against every economic theory I have seen.
I already supported that claim:
For private individuals who cannot print money and cannot effect the rate that a government prints money, the economy is a zero sum game.
You can’t just magic a few zeros onto your bank account. Wealth has to come from somewhere. Every dollar you make selling car tires (assuming you even own said production) means that a dollar of potential sales has been used. There is a limit to how many car tires can be sold. It is for the most part a zero sum game.
Regardless of how you’re ignoring what I said:
https://www.epi.org/blog/inequality-main-persistent-poverty/
How to say you don’t understand wealth or cash.
Are you saying stocks are not a form of wealth?
Or does this comment merely serve to insult my intelligence?
For private individuals who cannot print money and cannot effect the rate that a government prints money, the economy is a zero sum game
Neither can Elon. Yet you tried to link the two. The rich have nothing to do with you being poor. That’s economics 101.
I don’t buy into the economic inequality theory. It’s bogus. Rich people are not why you are poor.
Are you saying stocks are not a form of wealth?
It is but it’s not cash. It’s not easy to convert that amount of stock to cash. It’s funny money.
Neither can Elon
That’s my point. There is a limit to how many car tires can be sold. So when the rich sell more, that necessarily takes away potential sales from others. It’s basically a zero sum game.
And the rich own all the factories and production. So every dollar of product they sell is a dollar of sales that goes to them. That leaves not enough for the rest of us, making us impoverished.
It is but it’s not cash
But it’s wealth. And the original claim was about wealth, not cash. You are moving the goal posts, which is fallacious.
So when the rich sell more, that necessarily takes away potential sales from others
Not sure you understand how companies work. When they sell something. It doesn’t go into the pocket of Elon. It does into the funds of the company. For every Tesla sold. Elon receives zero dollars.
And the rich own all the factories and production
Elon owns zero factories. Same with bezos. Neither own any of those items.
So every dollar of product they sell is a dollar of sales that goes to them
Zero dollar goes to either one. I’m starting to see why you make the rants you make. You don’t understand shareholders or companies well.
If I buy ten teslas. Elon received zero dollars. If I spend a million dollars at Amazon bezos receives zero dollars.
Here is the latest consumer confidence report.
Why is this so hard to include this information in the article, newsweek? High Schoolers don’t do this crap
Grade school level journalism is what passes for content around here unfortunately. So it will continue to happen.
I’m no economist but I’d put this as consumer confidence falling after all the post holiday layoffs in tech finally went through. A very slight downward trend in confidence compared to the very slight optimism of the last 3 months. The unemployment rate and inflation rates have held steady so i think numbers will bounce back next month as it doesn’t seem to be based on actual market conditions.
The unemployment rate and inflation rates have held steady so i think numbers will bounce back next month as it doesn’t seem to be based on actual market conditions
I don’t think they will. Companies are going gang busters with layoffs. The real question is why when sales, etc seem fine. I think it’s to push people back to the office but I could be wrong.
