We live in a society… What makes you think he’d even have a channel if he didn’t need money?
Most of anything exist because people need money for food. Companies, technology, stuff. If people didn’t need money the channel most likely wouldn’t exist since stuff largely wouldn’t exist.
I think warm showers are quite common throughout the year, even in france.
He doesn’t use warm water for showers or only showers 3 times per year? That’s hardcore.
What do you want people to buy food with. Welfare checks lol? Where would they get money to buy stuff for testing. They have an acoustic chamber that’s fairly expensive.
Revenue and professional channels are intimately linked and removing the revenue stream would open them up to bought reviews like heiLTT.
Central heating for industries and homes requiring heat or warm water.
Hardly. The quality is worse than the mp3s I downloaded from the pirate bay back in the day. Aptx hd is better but fairly uncommon. Sbc in high bitrate wounds fairly good but I’ve only come across it on linux with pipewire.
The same can be said about Linköping, most of the town is ugly as hell.
Anyone can get a cheap ais receiver and plot the positions of ships around you quite easily so it doesn’t really make much of a difference.
Same or similar as back in the day. Some use private servers and some have automated stuff to grab new stuff to automatically, populate their self hosted streaming server with it to have their own curated netflix with any shows and movies from any source they desire and none of the filler.
Burn only the ac units. Would solve the problem and be a help in reducing energy emissions.
Eu is starting to talk about this too now. Where are we all gonna vpn to if the entire world has their own version of locked internet gates?
Sweden is generally against tax revenue going to the eu institution instead of the member countries themselves. The former is seen as a step toward eu federalization which sweden oppose. They are not against the tax itself.
Is it something they inherently do? No. Is it something they can do?, Of course. Just like anyone evolve over time. Especially when you’re into something just to be edgy.
The downgrade to digital projectors is what killed cinemas for me. It’s just a stuttering blurry mess with a poorly calibrated speaker setup to match.
I’d like to like the cinema but they removed the magic and left the 8$ small popcorn in It’s place.
It’s almost as if linux users are a group of many individuals with different reasonings behind their vastly different goals and priorities and not one homogenous group. Who would have thought?
Why do average users need to use linux. Let them stay in windows if that’s where they are happy. Making linux into a system just as shitty as windows will just replace shit with different shit.
Why does it need to be dumbed down for the average joe?
Why does guis need to be designed for the person not using it? Why not design them for the people using it now and improve them for the actual users of the software instead of the persons NOT using the software?
Thats a stupid idea and that very line of thought is the brainrot that has led to the enshittification of so much the last couple of decades.
They released the second season of the animesation for the Astrid Lindgren saga Ronja the Robbers daughter rather recently afaik. So they are doing stuff besides the movies.
Center channel downmix boost or something is the name. Iirc the phenomenon with quiet dialogue is due to most streaming content being delivered with surround audio. The shitty cheap video players used by the streaming services will do a cheap flat downmix to stereo which results in the center channel being too low when split into two mono channels for playback on stereo speakers compared to if it would be played on a dedicated center speaker. This is due to maths or something.
Back in the day dvd and even vhs movies had proper stereo mixes where the center channel would be boosted to audible levels.
Tl;dr: just pirate shit and use a proper video player instead of the cheapass players used by netflix, disney, etc.
Since the domain is bbc.com isn’t that just the original amp-ified version google caches?
I know the url is no indicator on who actually host that particular but I’m not on a computer now so can’t check if they are both actually hosted by bbc.