• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • Very much agree. BoTW is a good game and definitely worth playing but it isn’t a great game. My biggest gripe with it is that there is clearly a RPG leveling/XP system that they desperately try to hide. They don’t want to be an RPG but it is difficult for an open world game to not use those mechanics.

    So once you realize this you ask yourself why am I breaking all of these weapons just to get more weapons when the only outcome is that the enemies get harder. Blood moons are probably just world resets when you go up a level, which also makes higher level enemies appear.

    They also very apparently apply this to the rain patterns as well. Right away I went all in on exploring and getting shrines to increase stamina because it sure is handy to be able to climb large cliffs to explore the map. But I didn’t actually do much fighting during that time. Once I had stamina maxed and started just playing and clearly as I leveled up the chances of rain as soon as you approached a cliff side went up considerably making all of that work feel worthless.

    The end result was that playing more just meant things got worse, instead of a normal RPG where leveling up meant you gained abilities/stats instead the world just got harder. Sure the weapons got better but once you have the master sword you are always using that first and the harder the enemies get the less effective it is since its stats don’t change.

    The game also has some serious balancing issues with those levels. Until you get protective clothing it see a like nearly every enemy does exactly your health minus one heart in damage. Have 8 hearts? Ehh 7 of those don’t matter if you weren’t at 100% health you are dead anyways. Go through shrines to increase those hearts? Doesn’t matter enemies still nearly one shot you every time. Easily rectified if you buy/upgrade armor but if you are a cheap bastard like me and don’t want to spend money on items that might not be useful you end up playing quite a while before you understand that the deck is stacked against you.

    Also in general the map is very lifeless, and there is so little variation in enemies. They certainly are limited by the WiiU/Switch so can’t fault them too much on that front.

    ToTK fixes a lot of problems compared to BoTW but using the same map feels like it should have been DLC. Everything above/below the map feels like they just told an intern here is your spot go make a change in this area without having to make a change to the old map. And the story line feels very copy+paste from BoTW (go fight the four things in the four corners then go kill the big bad).

    Obviously the devices you can make and the increased variation in enemies fixes a lot of the complaints with BoTW, and helps keep you engaged with the game.

    ZD has a top tier storyline, but you need to be the type that cares about that to get the most out of it. I suspect most of the folks that don’t like Horizon are the type that don’t bother to listen to the audio files/read the text messages which really fills out the story. Gameplay is good but gets a little repetitive towards the end (once you are grinding thunderjaws for fun on very hard everything else is just too easy). Some enemies are just variations but the variations change how you approach fighting them.

    HFW the story isn’t nearly as good (still good but HZ is a high bar), but the variations in enemies and how you have to fight them is much better. If you are trying to get end game weapons the grind is a bit too much. Do yourself a favor and just change to story mode difficulty so you don’t have to waste hours of your time fighting the same enemies. If you just want to explore/fight across a huge beautiful map HFW is great for that.



  • Closest to this I’ve worked was a convenience store which included a deli.

    In that context the way I would have seen it was that he probably would have come in and bought them anyways, so the only difference to me would be sticking them in three bags vs one. No different than anyone else asking to cut their pizza a different way or whatever other minor out of the ordinary changes customers wanted.

    If we were swamped with orders then yeah I wouldn’t be happy about it, but you get over it and move on that is part of working retail.






  • If you are just looking to repurpose an old device for around the house use and it won’t ever be leaving your home network, then the simplest method is to set a static IP address on the device and leave the default gateway empty. That will prevent it from reaching anything other than the local subnet.

    If you have multiple subnets that the device needs to access you will need a proper firewall. Make sure that the device has a DHCP reservation or a static IP and then block outgoing traffic to the WAN from that IP while still allowing traffic to your local subnets.

    If it is a phone who knows what that modem might be doing if there isn’t a hardware switch for it. You can’t expect much privacy when that modem is active. But like the other poster mentiond a private DNS server that only has records from your local services would at least prevent apps from reaching out as long as they aren’t smart enough to fall back to an IP address if DNS fails.

    A VPN for your phone with firewall rules on your router that prevent your VPN clients from reaching the WAN would hopefully prevent any sort of fallback like that.


  • If you are accessing your files through dolphin on your Linux device this change has no effect on you. In that case Synology is just sharing files and it doesn’t know or care what kind of files they are.

    This change is mostly for people who were using the Synology videos app to stream videos. I assume Plex is much more common on Synology and I don’t believe anything changed with Plex’s h265 support.

    If you were using the built in Synology videos app and have objections to Plex give Jellyfin a try. It should handle h265 and doesn’t require a purchase like Plex does to unlock features like mobile apps.

    Linux isn’t dropping any codecs and should be able to handle almost any media you throw at it. Codec support depends on what app you are using, and most Linux apps use ffmpeg to do that decoding. As far as I know Debian hasn’t dropped support for h265, but even if they did you could always compile your own ffmpeg libraries with it re-enabled.

    How can I most easily search my NAS for files needing the removed codecs

    The mediainfo command is one of the easiest ways to do this on the command line. It can tell you what video/audio codecs are used in a file.

    With Linux and Synology DSM both dropping codecs, I am considering just taking the storage hit to convert to h.264 or another format. What would you recommend?

    To answer this you need to know the least common denominator of supported codecs on everything you want to play back on. If you are only worried about playing this back on your Linux machine with your 1080s then you fully support h265 already and you should not convert anything. Any conversion between codecs is lossy so it is best to leave them as they are or else you will lose quality.

    If you have other hardware that can’t support h265, h264 is probably the next best. Almost any hardware in the last 15 years should easily handle h264.

    When it comes to thumbnails for a remote filesystem like this are they generated and stored on my PC or will the PC save them to the folder on the NAS where other programs could use them.

    Yes they are generated locally, and Dolphin stores them in ~/.cache/thumbnails on your local system.




  • We should move away from income taxes. Consider a progressive income tax system, where the first 15k is not taxed, and the next 15k is taxed at a rate of 10%. Start here. Why are we taxing income at these levels?

    That is already exactly what we do today. Your personal standard deduction means that the first $10k you earn is not taxed. Everything over that starts in the lowest tax bracket and is only taxed at that level, filling each progressively higher bracket as you go up. Additional dependents increase the starting point of when you get taxed.

    When you do your taxes they give you charts to handle this calculation which gives you your “effective tax rate”, but those charts are based on this progressive system.

    Trade is good when it’s taking advantage of geographic advantages in a healthy way: I will trade you maple syrup for lemons. But not when a developed country is just exporting their exploitation: I have health, labour, environmental rules and you don’t let’s trade… A tarrif to equalize here makes sense.

    Very true but it isn’t entirely about labor/environmental rules. I think capitalism likes to tell us to blame their failings entirely on those things.

    In reality they have a few advantages that our capitalists don’t want you thinking about. When you have a billion people in your country you are working with scales that are considerably different. Also countries like China seem to be fine with giant vertically integrated monopolies (probably because they know they have the power to keep their corporations in line) which lets them reduce the middlemen taking their cuts along the way. And of course their giant government subsidies.

    And if we have industries that are so important and add enough overhead in cost to our other industries (such that they can’t be competitive with overseas monopolies), maybe the government should take those over so they aren’t running to make profit instead of adding tariffs that just tax the people. That could put all the other businesses in the country dependent on those base things (power/steel/batteries/etc) on at least a little more level ground.

    Tariffs may still be required but let’s not blame the entire situation on missing labor/environmental laws when uncontrolled capitalism is taking a big bite out of our end.

    Lastly developed economies should tax corporations on revenue (not income), this makes sense once they get to a certain size or share of the market. At the point where they are no longer adding value and instead just using size to hold market position through uncompetitive practices.

    I would say it is difficult to make laws that can effectively do this especially since different sectors have different sizes/expected revenues. It would be better if Congress would just do their job to just break up those companies when they get to that point. Or if their portion of the market no longer can foster healthy competition maybe it is time to treat them like a utility.






  • The switches don’t have to control the lights they are wired to. I have Inovelli z-wave switches, and on these you can disable the relay. So the switch can still send out commands/scenes on the network but the relay is always on.

    Then you would put in a relay unit in the electrical box of the lights or if you have enough room in with the switches. Then setup the switches to control their respective sets of lights.

    Might even be a switch out there that lets you disconnect the relay from the buttons on the switch but still control the relay which would cut down on the device count.


  • greyfox@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlCooked
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It might be the least effective especially for those not in swing states, but it certainly isn’t the least important.

    And as far as “not a democracy” the NPVIC isn’t that many states away from effectively rendering the problems with the electoral college moot. Certainly a steep uphill battle though.

    If voters actually turned out for primaries/elections there would be much better candidates. So your argument becomes “nobody else does it, and because of that the system is broken, and so I won’t do it either”.

    It seems like people get caught up in the media hype on the presidential election and forget that some of the most important change needs to start from the bottom up, and a couple of. votes can make a huge difference in State levels, and congressional/senate elections. A president is worthless without a Congress/senate passing laws that actually matter.

    Just look at what Minnesota has been able to with voter reform in the last year with their very narrow trifecta. I.e law went into effect this year that allows residents to sign up to automatically receive absentee ballots for every election/primary in their area. A minor improvement, but an important one. Guaranteed that there will be folks that wouldn’t bother to vote on non-presidential elections that will be now.

    They also added a “right to be absent from work to vote” which gives Minnesotans the ability to vote without using any sort of vacation/leave time without losing pay. Full list of other rather import changes here

    Things like that can snowball into a larger shift at the state level.

    The state has no need for you to legitimize them. Even if the system is weighted against you every vote still has power, and the only thing that not voting accomplishes is sending a message that you are okay with the system as it is. There are plenty of politicians out there that want change to happen, and they can’t do it without enough votes behind them.