$4 Sausage $4 Eggs $4 Bacon $2 Toast $1 OJ

The price seems very high for each ingredient but it sounds great as a breakfast

Reminds me of an interaction I had a long time ago.

    Me: :[
Friend: Turn that frown upside down!
    Me: ]:

This is phenomenal footage, and helps to establish how accurate their landing is without putting lives at risk

Does this indicate that the atmosphere within Dragon and the EVA suits is 100% O2? Or is the concern here to mitigate risks if the atmosphere happens to be 100% O2 in an emergency situation?

Are you unhappy SpaceX has yet to achieve with Starship what it’s achieved with Falcon 9?

Or to put it in another way, are you unhappy with SpaceX for not accomplishing something no one else has been able to accomplish?

HFY = Humanity Fuck Yeah! A place for writers to post their stories about humans being awesome. Many of them were sci-fi space operas which is what I loved.

Oh neat, didn’t know it had this feature, thanks!

I love you, thanks! Had no idea this was already integrated into the keyboard already.

Hang on, how do you use emoji kitchen with Gboard?

I’ll bite the bait and ask you to explain how Starlink satellites contribute towards the space junk problem without having to reference astronomy or bringing up you-know-who’s name.

https://lemmy.world/post/5730713

I have mine configured like this to mimic the RIF layout

What’s called sweet tea in the US is overwhelmingly sweet. That was my reaction to it the first time I tried it. It’s so sweet, the only way you can get that much sugar in it is if you dissolve that sugar in hot tea.

As far as we’re aware, dark matter only interacts with the universe gravitationally. It doesn’t even interact with itself, which is why we don’t see dark planets/stars/galaxies popping into existence. It only follows normal matter around.

As for why it’s not called cold, is for two reasons:

1. Cold gases of normal matter can condense to form stars. Dark matter doesn’t interact with itself, which implies it cannot condense into more concentrated forms of itself the way a gas cloud can eventually form a star.
2. We just don’t know what the stuff is, it could be clouds, planets, black holes, neutron stars, brown dwarfs, etc. But our best observations of dark matter are from very large distances away where we can measure the distortion of spacetime due to dark matter. We can’t see these smaller objects at these distances. But we should be able to see other clues that would indicate it’s normal matter.

If it happened to be clouds of gas and dust that overall had a net gravitational effect on the background galaxies, we’d be able to detect the spectral lines of these clouds. Same for just about all the other objects in that list. In some cases we do detect intergalactic gas clouds. But in places where there’s very clearly unaccounted for gravitational lensing, there isn’t any sign of this. So far the only things we can match up to the observations is a mathematical model of the stuff.

Flawless launch and landings as usual 🥹

From a technical standpoint, I can’t see media-heavy social media in the format of Facebook lasting too long in a federated environment considering the costs involved to maintain the server instance. Trying to do that while being free is absolutely unsustainable. Another shift in resource management would have to happen before platforms like that would be inexpensive and scalable.

Currently, Lemmy instances are slowly and steadily growing with each user interaction within, and between instances. Most shared content is link aggregation meaning minimal server resources. But resource usage goes up much faster when images, or even videos are uploaded to be shared. This format will only grow more expensive over time, and definitely won’t last in the current format.

Ah, updated Connect and can confirm it behaves normally, sorry about that! (Thought it had already updated)

Still loving all the updates and thanks for the amazing work!

It’s not really a bug, just wonky behavior. When viewing a large image that requires zooming, moving around in the image seems to make connect close the image. So I end up trying to view the image several times, or get frustrated enough to download the image just to view it 🥲

Oh hey you added in the comment stuff! It’s great for an initial release, though it definitely does need some refinement to be easily useable.

• Comment feature buttons
  • They mostly work well, and look great! But tapping a comment does push the entire comment down as the buttons on top appear. Versus the ideal behavior of the comment position remaining absolute, and the buttons appear relative to it
  • Also, on narrow screens, the Next button does get pushed off a little bit
• Done
  • Functions as expected, hides the extra buttons from the active comment
• Hide
  • Correctly hides the comment when tapped
• Show
  • This shouldn’t need to exist, as tapping on a hidden comment should automatically show it
• Prev
  • Correctly activates the previous top comment, and shows the selected comment features. UI moves the selected comment just off-screen, so you have to scroll down some more to see it, even if it was already on-screen
• Next
  • Same issues as the Prev button, comment selection is correct, but off-screen