It’s actually not that hard.
I understand it’s authoritarian in your eyes, I see that and understand the argument you’re making as well but you won’t accept that I know that.
Perhaps seek to look beyond your confirmation biases and assumptions of others.
The only thing you can be 100% sure of is that you’re projecting your own ignorance.
I enjoy how you fully admit you haven’t read it but take on the verisimilitude of a moral high ground after gently skimming and confirming your bias.
Very cute.
I read the bill instead.
Why get it interpreted second hand?
I believe I’ve addressed your opinions correctly.
I read the content of the bill, not the video, and thought through it without having my opinions spoonfed by a YouTube huckster.
IMO This appears to be a reasonable dual purpose bill to stop snow washing and strengthen our borders for war footing.
How do you quantify it as harmful? Genuinely curious.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I agree with you in part as well, I’ve made my opinions known.
I however have no intention of holding a serious conversation with someone who calls me a liar and stupid in the first breath.