A simple rule of thumb is that one should remove everything including and after the first question mark in any link intended for a post.
A simple rule of thumb is that one should remove everything including and after the first question mark in any link intended for a post.
But I agree. Antagonize them endlessly.
My goal is not to antagonize. We do not agree.
I genuinely love where I live (Bay Area)
The people are of much higher quality on the eastern slopes of the Sierra Nevada.
I stopped working with them. I’m much happier for it.
Communist revolution because capitalism has failed as predicted is the primary and public point of community unification for hexbear. Your assertions are laughable.
K. I feel like others’ understanding isn’t your priority.
You’ve delivered non-sequitur. I’ve not misunderstood. You’ve failed to adequately communicate.
Remember that the opponent never communicates in good faith. There’s only two languages they understand: money and physical violence.
Because a brand became the target of theft others dislike those that purchase them? That makes no sense whatsoever.
Absolutely unadulterated bullshit. You either have no clue what you’re talking about or you are a foreign operative here intentionally trying to undermine democracy. GTFO!
Shallow understanding, a lack of reasoning, and false dichotomy won’t get you far as a programmer. You’ll stagnate in the exploitation stage.
I’m glad you got yourself out of that abusive situation.
Removed by mod
If you don’t have dependants then I encourage you to get your name on that first list. We’ll die together, without regret, our dignity intact.
If cheap is the goal and Honda is out of budget then Kia appears to be a wise choice.
Why are you worried that others would be unhappy that you chose a Kia?
You delivered nonsense without even considering semantic. You felt entitled to others figuring it out for you. And, you were rejected due to your lack of effort.
I’ll now reject you for gaslighting me about your comments, which I’ve read, and the follow up strawman.
It’s simply not good enough. I don’t care why. But, I know you’ve nothing to contribute but practice material for identifying logical fallacy.
You’ve forgotten to mention the minority that did not agree and how strongly they believed they were correct. You’ve seemingly not considered that democracy’s best case scenario is mediocrity.
We will not be led by or stagnate upon popularity among the lumpen. Democracy be damned when faced with such a threat.
Predictable responses, now assigning me intent. I’ll no longer disturb your comfortable order. Best of luck, neolib.
Did I fault your content or your presentation of it?
Nice strawman. You just can’t help yourself.
Here’s the vote that approved the granular instance-by-instance approach
And then what happened? It seems like you were present for awhile but perhaps not in the trenches, through the OpSec, and to the end.
What?
Indeed.
Are you describing the consensus building and struggle sessions as “forcing the wisest decision on everyone”?
Q: Why did hexbear brigade the fediverse?
A: Certainly for the lulz. /s
Definitely not a neolib
Language analysis of your post history says differently. If you’re not a neolib troll then perhaps you should stop presenting as such.
The undesirable kids are weeded out. But, the intent is to teach them that order is maintained through fear of physical violence.