Plus, if you had two-day battery life, when the battery inevitably degrades, you’ll still have solid battery life.

But the companies want you to buy a new phone when the battery degrades.

Nah, it used to mean coke-addled idiot.

They could easily request bad advice, then change the content of the search bar before taking a screenshot.

This is the rational opinion. Which should be enough to let you know that it’s not the majority opinion. Consumers, as a collective, are nearly braindead.

Yeah, corpos always claim that. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, we just changed some words, it doesn’t actually have any practical effect…

Yeah, well if it doesn’t then why bother doing it?

F yeah, gonna check it out

Except in 99.9% of cases nothing gets fixed after deployment either. That’s just an excuse not to admit that from the get-go.

Didn’t think so.

Do you know the difference between “says” and “asks”?

Are you having a seizure?

Now you’re just repeating your idiocy. Are you a politician?

There you go again, not thinking before commenting. It just makes you say stupid things.

You should consider thinking about what people say before responding. It will probably lead to improved understanding and more relevant replies on your part.

And several of them are here ITT saying that the browser is sketchy.

The company was founded and is headed by a homophobic anti-vaxxer. Plus, the browser is not secure and has been involved in several controversies in the oast for things like selling user data and running a crypto scam.

To Hori, a company that makes fairly decent third-party controllers. They likely had a reasonable expectation that the product wouldn’t be shit.

It disgusts me to defend Nintendo in anything but this just isn’t their fault.

Censorship is bad, but Facebook and X’s entire business models revolve around spreading content that is at once false and inflammatory, either just to create engagement or for more malicious purposes, and they reach a huge portion of the population directly, including children, teenagers, the mentally ill and other vulnerable populations. This requires a new understanding of accountability for spreading information.

I wouldn’t agree that it makes sense to hold a Mastodon instance responsible for what its users post, because they don’t have a financial incentive or the ability to promote misinformation at a massive scale. Twitter does. As Aristotle said, we must treat equals equally, and treat the unequal unequally according to the form and extent of their inequality.

It’s not an official Nintendo product.

I think that the point is “Rowling claims to want to protect cis women but even cis women would be harmed if she got her way, so nobody actually benefits”. Maybe it’s too charitable an interpretation but then again maybe not.

I squarely disagree. People who dedicate as much time and energy to making life worse for others as her are clearly living with intense negative emotions that they don’t know how to deal with in a healthy manner. Happy people don’t campaign against rights for others. Rowling is clearly a miserable and pathetic person. In the game of life, she’s losing to the average favela musician who has no money but loves their community.