she/her failed chemistry experiment blobhaj, flag, trans, transgender

  • 2 Posts
  • 203 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 16th, 2025

help-circle


  • Panini@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoaww@lemmy.worldClever doggo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    AI detectors are categorically useless, and should not even be referenced, let alone relied upon, to tell if something is AI. Treat them with the same level of skepticism you would a lie detector, ie complete fucking quackery. (I can explain this in depth if you’d like, but the long and short is that if an AI were capable of differentiating it’s own work from a human’s without a watermark, it would also be able to improve it’s human mimicry to exactly that same standard it’s detecting, thus destroying that capability)

    The artist does have a consistent style and if you follow their page back you can see their work and growth detailed like any other actual artist, including in-progress pieces. This isn’t AI, the artist’s style has simply been stolen and copied by AIs, and now you’re faulting the artist for their own work being effectively stolen en mass.








  • They may like to see the Iranian leadership weakened, but all of them are more concerned about a scenario of chaos and uncertainty and the possibility of more radical elements coming to power there,” Anna Jacobs Khalaf, a Gulf analyst and non-resident fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute, told Al Jazeera last month.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m extremely opposed to a war in Iran for no fucking reason, in large part because I give a shit about the well being of the Iranian people and want to see them make their own way out of authoritarian theocracy without western intervention. But I’m not exactly sure what more radical group could possibly come to power there than the Ayatollah. Is ISIS-K a serious enough political entity that it could end up wielding any actual power in the aftermath? Cause I don’t see anyone else who could be much more radical (while maintaining something resembling a state) than what they’ve already got.




  • In India I’m mostly referring to the ongoing descent into theocratic authoritarianism and hindu-nationalism. Historically I agree, they’ve done pretty well for themselves given where they started, but it’s right this moment that they’re veering in a decidedly unpleasant and less grounded direction.

    Idk how much the French cultural influence can really be attributed to the maintenance of relative sanity in Canada, but it seems like a sorta far-fetched theory to me. France is going a pretty questionable direction right now too, with a near majority of the country embracing an ethnonationalist, barely-hiding-the-nazism far right party, and that’s a pretty unsurprising reflection of the same historical factors as influence English speaking nations too. Quebec isn’t exactly a bastion of cultural stability in the last few decades either, but I guess you’re right that it’s not quite on the level of the anglosphere.