Valve quietly not publishing games that contain AI generated content if the submitters can’t prove they own the rights to the assets the AI was trained on

    • effingjoe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you don’t see that as a problem then this conversation isn’t worth having and your views are unimportant.

      My views only matter if they align with yours? This is a pretty ignorant way to go through life.

      In any event, I guess it depends on what you mean by:

      this has the potential to severely displace skilled individuals, and not just artists

      If, by “displace” you mean they can’t get paid to do something they used to get paid to do, then no, I do not see that as a problem. That’s just how technological progress works.

      However, if by displace you mean “they end up destitute on the streets”, then yes, I do see that as a problem. A problem that should be solved by something that disconnects the need to work with the ability to live comfortably-- something like a UBI, not by trying to hold back technological progress to artificially keep those jobs in demand.

      So, does my view matter?

        • effingjoe@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          How bad do you feel when your phone calls are routed without a human making the connections? How terrible do you feel when your refrigerator makes ice for you for essentially free, instead of having to pay someone to get it to your door?

          This is not a new thing, and it’s draconian to suggest that technology be held back to keep people artificially in demand.

          Your silly stance on this reminds me of an equally silly quote from the late great Douglas Adams:

          I’ve come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:

          1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
          2. Anything that’s invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
          3. Anything invented after you’re thirty-five is against the natural order of things.
            • effingjoe@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The principle doesn’t change. Yes, your stance is silly. So silly that I’m guessing you’re financially impacted in some way.

                • effingjoe@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The situation is exactly the same. Technology is rendering some human labor unnecessary. Like it has many times before. Like it will many times in the future. You can gnash your teeth and beat your breast about how gosh darn unfair it is, but it won’t change it, or stop it, or even slow it down.

                  And yes, when people take irrational, emotional stances against change, it’s almost always because they have financial skin in the game.