• palal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s not enough solar production capacity to sustain China’s demand, nevermind the world’s.

    • HikingVet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One type of source is not even close to ideal. The grid should be diverse and decentralised.

      Your idea is stunted.

      • palal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who’s meeting the demand of emerging economies for solar panels?

        It’s not the US, who’s steadfastly adopted an economic protectionist stance.

        It’s not China, who can’t keep up with their domestic demand for solar panels.

        It’s not the EU, who’s too stuck in a regulatory quagmire to meaningfully invest in solar panel manufacturing.

        It’s not India, who, like China, can’t keep up with their domestic demand.

        It’s also not going to be ASEAN, because they too are supply-constrained.

        Solar panels don’t magically appear.

        • HikingVet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What is your short sighted hardon for solar panels about? To me it shows that you aren’t informed on the subject and think that a logistics problem is a vaild detractor from the use of the technology.

          Windmills, hydro, geothermal, and gasp nuclear.

          Like, fuck, you seem like you would walk into an apple store see a lack of Iphones and then delcare “there aren’t enough phones available”, while ignoring androids.

          • palal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Let me just deploy nuclear, hydro, geothermal, and gigantic wind turbines in an emerging country.

            Oh. Oops.

            • HikingVet
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You really don’t understand engineering do you?

              Hydro, windmill, and geothermal have multiple different levels of size. These technologies are actually ideal for developing nations, as they can build their grid without fossil fuels.

              Nuclear is incredibly safe when following IAEA guidelines and not a being chucklefuck like you.

              I don’t know what you are specifically arguing for, but you definitely aren’t making your case or one against renewables and non fossil fuels.

              • palal@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Let me just build a 20 billion dollar nuclear reactor in a country without a functioning grid.

                Oh.

                • HikingVet
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Oh, you don’t actually listen to people and pretends they don’t have an understanding of the world.

                  Have fun yelling into the void.

                  • palal@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The article’s talking about solar. Read it. Understand it.