geteilt von: https://lemmy.world/post/8371095

Long post and well worth the read, but the interesting part to me is this:

Windows operating system and apps

Customers using Windows have always used a combination of operating system functionality as well as apps, but now Windows will clearly identify operating system functionality in places like Settings, Start, and Search:

  • Settings > System > System Components will show notable operating system components.
  • Start menu’s All Apps list has been renamed to All and operating system components are labeled with “system”.
  • Under Search, search results will show operating system components labeled with “system”.

All apps in Windows can be uninstalled. Of course, apps can always be installed again from the Microsoft Store and internet. Settings > Apps > Installed apps continue to show all the apps installed on the PC and we’ve added the ability to uninstall:

  • Camera
  • Cortana
  • Web Search from Microsoft Bing, in the EEA
  • Microsoft Edge, in the EEA
  • Photos
  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, they went to the trouble of keeping a different set of functionalities just for Europe instead of unshittifying Windows for everyone. Wow.

    • vmachiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So it must be worth a lot of money to force al of that stuff on users right?

      • Sigmatics
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nobody would be using their ad-bloated software otherwise

        • vmachiel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is it that bad now? I don’t use windows products in my private life, only at work. And I don’t find things that bad over there, but maybe that’s because it’s windows for business

          • notepass@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your business sysadmins will have gone through the trouble of getting rid of any bullshit. My companies windows installs are more chill than default win11 versions.

          • AAA@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not. People just like to complain. Ad-bloat in the Camera, and Photos app? Edge doesn’t show more ads than other browsers without an ad-blocker. I don’t think Cortana is specifically pushing ads and Web Search from Bing… well Google is also pushing ads wherever they can.

            This is not about ads, it’s about choice.

            • Sigmatics
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              Edge used to be fine until the recent GPT craze. Now they added a giant obnoxious Bing AI circle ad in the top right. Bing is of course default everywhere. At this point I’m just waiting for the MSN bar to reappear

            • Demosthememes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re partly right, it is not about ads. It is about the integrated control of your camera, your media & other peripherals/software/data by Cortana - which rings home all day long - all from behind closed source software which does who-knows-what with the information it gathers.

      • zerofk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        How quickly they forget. Canonical added Amazon ads to Ubuntu 10 years ago. They walked it back after huge backlash, but don’t believe that any corporate-backed Linux is immune to “shittifying”.

        • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The good thing about that is that you have the choice to avoid Ubuntu and still retain 100% functionality (at least as a private user), but there’s only a small handful of Windows versions with extremely minor differences.

      • trollercoaster@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Linux distributions and/or components have been, and will be, shittified repeatedly. Not as badly as commercial operating systems, but pretty bad anyway.

      • Shayeta@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it has never been good enough for the average terminal-averse user to begin with.

        • Sureito@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t need that in todays world. Otherwise the Steam Deck would have been dead on arrival

          • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Counter-point, on the Steam Deck/ SteamOS almost anything involving getting past the one app shell (Steam) or installing from a store (flathub) requires terminal and often does not survive system updates. It honestly sounds like Windows 8 typing it out.

        • ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are plenty of distros which can be operated entirely through graphical user interfaces. Ubuntu, for example.

        • MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love Linux, but I’ll admit what you say has some credence.

          Linux has a lot of polish now. Most big distros are going to have an easy to use GUI installer, and there are several mature very usable desktop environments.

          But, for example, if a new user has an nvidia card it’s probably going to be a poor experience for them and they won’t understand why or how to fix it. So there’s shortcomings there. I blame nvidia for this specific issue, but your average user probably doesn’t care about that. They just want their video card to work well.

          • Shayeta@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is definitely getting better. I’ve been running the same Arch installation with KDE for the last 5 years at work. Surprisingly stable and had little to no issues.

            Still, the issues I did have required a basic understanding of what a package manager is, what does sudo do, and other general linux knowledge.

            The results difference between a newbie googling “wifi doesnt work” and an experienced user googling “networkmanager service logs showing error XY” is just too great.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hmm… but the registry hooks for those uninstalls must be in there even if the option isn’t surfaced in the UI right?

      Maintaining different UI options is one thing, maintaining completely different OS versions is another… and it seems like it would be prohibitively complex and expensive to do that.

      Probably all you’d need is for someone with the EU version to export a backup of the relevant parts of their registry, and distribute that so anyone who wants to can have the same uninstall options. The trick would be keeping it that way through Windows updates.

    • Treczoks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, they are no longer allowed to milk victims in the EU thanks to good laws. That does not mean they cannot exploit those who are not protected.

    • Madis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well… dependencies can still exist, which would justify the “system” marking. For example, different programs’ WebViews depend on Edge nowadays, though maybe it is possible to isolate having that rendering engine without having the full browser program.

      • Redeven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Microsoft already has a webview software that deals with that, which afaik already also comes with Windows, and is independent of Edge.

        Edge, the browser proper, is in no way a dependency of anything else.

        • Demosthememes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          This came about from the Netscape v MSFT browser wars; where MSFT tried to argue that because IE was bolted directly into the OS, it therefore had to come preinstalled without asking & could not be uninstalled. The court ordered them to unbolt it & bundle it as a separate install - just like other browsers.

      • Treczoks@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        For example, different programs’ WebViews depend on Edge nowadays

        I.e. the programmer could not care less about adherence to standards. Or, in other words: The software is buggy.

        • trigonated@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you might’ve misunderstood what a WebView is.

          A WebView is just another UI component/control/widget that windows apps can use, just like how things like buttons, check boxes, text fields, etc are also UI components. The idea is for developers to be able to just use those common components instead of re-programming them every time.

          The WebView is used to display html content (not necessarily web pages) inside an app without the developer needing to basically program or embed an entire browser engine in their app just to show something.

          • Treczoks@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you might’ve misunderstood what a WebView is.

            I don’t think so. It’s a box displaying HTML. If it depends solely on Edge being present and installed - this is a bug (of the WebView implementation). If it could be based on any browser, but the user puts Edge-specific non-standard HTML in it, it’s a bug, too (this time by the HTML provider).

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to see this on android too. That shit is the worst. I know we can root and remove it or disable it. It should not be there in the first place and it should definitely be removable.

    • superbirra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      fyi a lot of preinstalled crapware can be uninstalled just by using adb, no need to root

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The big issue here is that it’s both the carriers and the manufacturers who make money off the crapware that’s preinstalled. Many Android phones are generally cheaper by hardware spec compared to iPhones specifically because someone is making money of the preinstalled crapware.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t kid yourself, phone cost exactly as much as the company selling them can charge. They don’t lower the price because they are making money off the crapware. It only increases their profits.

        Android phones are cheaper than iPhones because people are willing to pay more for iPhones.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your carriers install crapware?

        Never seen it happen, but I also don’t buy into the scam that is carrier phones subscriptions.

    • sv1sjp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am running DivestOS, a degoogled hardened version of Android.

      You can remove as many apps as you like, BUT then, you have no access to your banks, to services etc. We are literally talking about modern slavery on Android if you are Google free… Without Google’s Safety net, most banks and subscribtion based applications are not working. You are enforced to have Google on your phone. Or have 2 devices. One for big brother, one for your personal use.

      • MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not an expert on it, but I imagine it’s probably not the most complex task in the world to program those anti-cheats with Proton in mind. With increased Linux gaming (thanks Steam Deck!) It’s probably worth it, financially.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You just switched it out with a different devil.

      How are those drivers?

      Is your audio working?

      • lichtmetzger@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Drivers? Do you mean the kernel modules that get automatically loaded without a problem on each boot?

        My audio works really well. Why wouldn’t it? The ALSA days are long gone and pulseaudio has matured enough to work great, even with Bluetooth.

        I even got Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator working, I’m never going back to an OS that breaks its own photo viewer app with an update. Twice.

      • MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Both are great, everything just works* on my Linux install, thanks.

        • I don’t use Nvidia. Because their drivers suck. So validity on your drivers comment.
  • b9chomps@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ll be updating  Windows 10, version 22H2 and Windows 11, version 23H2 PCs in the EEA to be compliant by March 6th, 2024.

    Not just Win11, but Win10 as well. Nice.

    • init@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It just so happens I will be reinstalling my windows partition and “moving to Europe” in March of next year too!

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” is a very good thing when the government gives a shit about the people it governs.

    • AbsolutelyNotABot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Slow down

      It’s the same Union that wants to ban cryptography in instant messaging apps. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes…well

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Windows uses the region chosen by the customer during device setup to identify if the PC is in the EEA. Once chosen in device setup, the region used for DMA compliance can only be changed by resetting the PC.

    Uuh. I hope I have that set to my actual location despite using en-US as display language.

    Thinking about it, I’m pretty sure it should be correct.

    I hate when apps use your format settings instead of display language to decide the language they display. Having to reset the Windows installation would be a much bigger hassle though.

    • virku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve often fixed these settings post installation. I guess doing it right the first time is important now.

    • Chup@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      That step they don’t have to go makes me think with Windows 12, the whole process will likely start from 0. They will try to implement everything again, waiting for courts or politics to take some decisions after years.

      • zecg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the circle of shit, but they were forced well before Windows 10 is EoL’d, that’s good

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another post linked an article by windowscentral which states that these changes will also be rolled out to Win10

    • Teebeutel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get your point but in software development some telemetry data ist very helpful and also nessesary to improve or fix your software. Microsoft though and almost all tech companies are collecting much much more than needed.

      • Xkdrxodrixkr@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Telemetry isnt a substitute for actual bug reports, and if a company wants to know how their software is being used… then they can always just ask? or just do some actual user testing?

    • CyberDine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could by the Pro license then modify Group Policy to restrict telemetry down to the bare minimum.

  • AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cortana and Microsoft Bing are going right out the window, Microsoft Edge will have to stay as a necessary evil to deal with moronically designed websites. Hear, hear!

  • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wish this would make sense, but if I want to watch Netflix in better quality than 720p then I have to use Edge and Geforce Now won’t work decent with Firefox either. They do already have systems in place that will make it hard to decide to not have Edge on your PC if you live in the EU. I still only use it for these special cases and Firefox for everything else, but damn do I hate it.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a Netflix issue, not a Windows one.

      Netflix requires not only extremely specific DRM, they also have a whitelist of what containers are allowed to see the higher resolution. It’s a whole problem on Android too.

      It’s not Microsoft somehow forcing you to use Edge, it’s Netflix.

      In other news, my Jellyfin server’s web UI works even if you’re using outdated Firefox versions on Hannah Montana Linux.