• flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The launcher is quite nice to use, fast and search oriented (I never used any of the start menu on windows besides the search bar anyway so the fact it’s the main focus is nice)

    Virtual desktops (only on Wayland) are very well implemented and feel very smooth, three finger swipe works a charm, with the forge extension it tiles servicably as well

    Also just one of the nicest looking DEs imo. I have since switched to hyprland because I wanted first class tiling support but I have my system UI looking very similar to gnome’s, using mostly gnome’s applications

    Having used gnome on Ubuntu a couple years ago I have to say it has come miles recently (also Ubuntu’s gnome in my opinion is not as good as vanilla gnome) - it feels very clean and intuitive out of the box

    • Flatfire
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      The launcher is a fair point. Though for me at least, not having the spotlight-esque search hasn’t been a problem. Appearance is an odd one, since the best part of Both Gnome and KDE is the wonderful flexibility in visual customizability. At the end of the day, I suppose I’d happily use either. Right now, I think Plasma’s big features for me has to be window snapping and, once 6.0 releases, hopefully HDR support.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think gnome is particularly customizable visually, you can change theme and use extensions if you really want to buy their main focus is making one really good UI and I’ve gotta respect that

        At least in my opinion gnome looks far better than KDE out of the box, KDE just looks like windows to me

        Gnome has fairly good window snapping as well I think and stuff like pop shell and forge for tiling