• Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    She’s never been afraid to speak her mind. How do we address the issue of climate change, if we turn a blind eye to the suffering of innocent people and children done intentionally for vengeance’s sake?

      • AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention all the destruction of farms, the poisoning of water sources, all the destroyed vehicles and rotting corpses of men and animals alike laid everywhere.

        They will be calling this the 2nd Nakba. Not only is it a massacre of the people, the Palestinians last remaining lands have been salted. Gaza looks like Stalingrad.

        It is an entirely man made disaster. Or state made disaster if you will.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well focus is generally useful for getting things done so one way to address climate change would be to stick to climate change discussion at climate change discussion events.

      • bradbeattie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Want to sabotage a protest? Encourage advocacy for increasingly tangential issues. Focus splits, folks start disagreeing on new issues, folks start disagreeing on how issues get prioritized, everything falls apart.

        Sadly, this doesn’t even require a malicious actor encouraging it. Well-meaning folks see a potentially sympathetic audience for their pet issue and boom.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing builds a coalition as effectively as insisting that you absolutely must include a controversial but completely unrelated topic in the effort.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        At some point an acute issue takes precedence over your long term goals. These are pretty wild hyperbole, but I acknowledge I am trying to paint an image.

        Let’s say you were an activist for the welfare of cattle. But then you find out chickens are hooked up to a new feed system that increases their weight by 20% but also causes them excruciating neurological pain, to the point the chickens are even trying to peck themselves to death to avoid the torture. Would it not make sense to pivot for a moment to the worse animal cruelty for a while? The cows aren’t going anywhere.

        Let’s say you were an activist for climate and a nation state was running towards genociding an entire group of people. Would it not make sense to pivot to the genocide speed run for a while? Climate change isn’t going anywhere.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those are two separate and unrelated issues, and should be treated as such.

      • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is extremely valuable. She has a powerful voice and far-reaching influence. She is using her voice to advocate for the voiceless. Israel is an apartheid state, and they must be held accountable for the crimes against humanity they are committing and have historically committed against the people and nation of Palestine.

          • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You can’t just spout off a buzz word as tho it’s an actual argument.

            She’s standing with Palestine against those who are mass murdering them. She has powerful influence. Her choosing to say this legitimately will influence public opinion.

            • BerührtGras@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              No it wont. Greta is the climate lady. And if the climate lady says stuff which i disagress with, i wont listen to the climate lady anymore. I even hate the climate lady now.

              • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Greta is one of the most influential people of her entire generation. She is a powerful orator who has already had major impacts on climate policy around the world, and she has a massive audience.

                You’re not the entirety of the world.

                • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  She is a powerful orator who has already had major impacts on climate policy around the world,

                  I really don’t think she’s as important as you think she is, or anywhere near as influential.

                  • autokludge@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago
                    She is a powerful orator who has already had major impacts on climate policy around the world,
                    

                    I really don’t think she’s as important as you think she is, or anywhere near as influential.

                    Her influence extends to rustling the jimmies of mainstream media, I get to hear all about it the next day from coworkers over lunch … “did you hear about what she said this time?”

      • Rentlar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure why you think it’s valueless. Bringing up the mere topic of Palestine suffering gets your mic taken away, prosecuted and look at like a Hamas sympathizer. It’s as much virtue signalling as getting arrested blocking the entrance of an oil conference - as in it’s not.

        Wars tend to lead to built and natural areas alike getting razed, it’s a huge waste of resources and lives. And what for? Political gain? Money for the Military Industrial Complex? All those vehicles except for drones use fossil fuel, and rightwing governments rallying support over wars definitely don’t give a rat’s ass for the climate. So in summary, the Gaza issue and yhe climate are definitely related.