• LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article it sounds like there were two people randomly shooting at a car. It’s plausible that the other guy just gave him one if his guns.

    • Knoxvomica
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Either way and my point still stands. It’s fucking insanity.

      • MTLion3@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well when Americans INSIST that rootin tootin point and shootin is the only way, then yeah - this shit is gonna keep happening. I’m all about better gun laws, but you’d think I’m growing devil horns when I talk about it

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shouldn’t it be a crime to give a loaded gun to someone who is mentally incompetent to stand trial?

      • yenahmik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is someone who is not mentally competent enough to stand trial allowed to return to society? He should have been under medical supervision, not wandering the streets.

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          That costs money. If we spent money on medical needs, who would fund the war machine?

    • TheJims@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are more guns than people in this country. Even if you banned their sale entirely there will still be plenty to go around.

      • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For a time. But if you made it illegal to transfer a firearm by any means and set up a buy-back program where when gun owners died the government would claim the guns and provide fair compensation to the estate you could get rid of the guns without taking anyone’s guns away. It would take decades, of course, but every day there would be few guns out there and, importantly, the young people that commit most gun violence would be the people with the hardest time getting and carrying one. You can’t expect we’ll solve a problem that took decades to metastasize overnight anyway.

        So there are solutions. That’s just one. We don’t solve this problem not because we can’t but because we don’t have the will to.

        • TheJims@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I appreciate your optimism but standing here in red rural America I don’t think it will ever happen. There are an insane amount of guns here with more and more every day.

          • Murderturd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’d be surprised what people are willing to let go of when they see children in their community being murdered. Doesn’t matter what political spectrum you’re on. There are major gun safety advocates who used to be 2a Rambo’s who lost children and realized how wrong they were. It’s just not worth it.

            • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              thats the problem with conservatives in the untied states though… their complete lack of empathy means they dont care to change until someone kills their kid

            • jimbo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’d be surprised what people are willing to let go of when they see children in their community being murdered.

              LOL, let me tell you about a town in Connecticut called Newtown and how the events there changed absolutely nothing about US gun policies…

              • Murderturd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’d urge you to actually look at the response. Look at the legacy section of the sandy hook shooting. It actually did change the laws in some places in other places it got worse.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          theres about 50% of us or more who also feel we should start sooner than later in solving for the gun issue… but now with trump banging his cult drum, and one of those drum beats is the ‘2nd amendment’ were kinda fucked.

          it would take a constitutional amendment, which we havent done in a long time… and with as useless as the 2 parties are right now, it wont happen.

          • Murderturd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Trump himself once said “take the guns first then figure it out.” One of the only cool things he’s said.

          • scrape@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            More than %50. Gun ownership is %50 for only white males. It is only about %15 for the rest of the country. Only one demographic has a culture of violence.