Is my understanding correct that there are no @framework laptops in 16x9 (or 16x10) aspect ratios available right now? eg the pre-order for next quarter delivery is the only option?

It is moderately likely I will need a laptop before that time window and dont want to miss the opportunity to get a framework (but the 3:2* aspect ratio… isn’t for me).

*[edited aspect ratio to correct one]

  • N-E-N
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The 16 in is 16:10, the 13in is 3:2. I suspect you’d end up liking the aspect ratio of you gave it a shot, I much prefer it to 16:9

    • SatyrSack@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s barely different anyway. Do the math, and it comes out to comparing 16:10 to 16:10.667

    • jlow (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Always wondered about this. Why do you like it? All computers were like this way back when so it can’t be too bad but why do you orefer it?

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Generally, readibility is better when you have a larger vertical aspect the aspect ratio. Especially in the age where many sites are designed with verticality in mind due to the prevalence of mobile.

        16:9 is good for media consumption and games, but its not ideal for general web browsing and reading.

      • SomeBoyo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mostly work in fullscreen windows and the 3:2 aspect ratio allows me to have more code/text on my screen at once, while keeping the laptops size small.

    • Ike@pkm.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @NENathaniel Ooops! You are right, 3:2. Not sure what I was thinking when I typed 3:4.

      Will update my post to reflect.

      Thank you for the response.

      I’d really have to try the 3:2 out for awhile and don’t want to front the money to do that right now (cash is tight and would rather ‘go with what I know’ at this time).

    • Ike@pkm.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @David_Eight There are a few reasons:

      - momentum. I’m used to it and 3:2 is an unknown and I dont have room in my budget (money, time, attention) to experiment with an unknown

      - I want the same aspect ratio for my laptop as my monitor when docked so that window configuration is consistent between both

      - I like to use vertical split for side by side windows

      - I occasionally play video games and watch movies which are often designed for 16x9

      • David_Eight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. You could just go to a store and look at a laptop with a 3:2 screen. There’s plenty of them on sale today.
        2. Might be a legit problem, idk really.
        3. You still can with a 3:2 screen
        4. Also legit problem. Fun fact IMAX(2.83:2) movies are actually closer to 3:2 than 16:9. Standard movies are shot in 1.85:1(16.65:9) not 16:9. So no matter what screen you watch on it’ll never be quit right. This fact doesn’t help you at all I just think it’s bullshit and wanted you to know lol.

        But to answer your question, you are correct. The only Framework laptop you will be able to purchase in the near future is the 13.5 inch which is 3:2. So if that’s a deal breaker for you, you’ll need to buy something else.

        • Ike@pkm.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          @David_Eight Thanks! Yeah, I’d like to look at a 3:2 at the store first but I’m not ready to convert as of right now. :)

          That *IS* a fun fact! thank you for mentioning it. As a teenager, I worked as a projectionist at a movie theatre. Good times.