Israel’s military has claimed it has encircled Gaza City and divided the besieged coastal strip into two, as Gaza came under its third total communications outage since the start of the war.

“Today, there is north Gaza and south Gaza,” Israeli army spokesman Daniel Hagari told reporters on Sunday, calling it a “significant stage” in Israel’s war against Hamas.

Israeli media reported that troops are expected to enter Gaza City within 48 hours. Strong explosions were seen in northern Gaza after nightfall.

But the “collapse in connectivity” across Gaza reported by internet access advocacy group NetBlocks.org and confirmed by the Palestinian telecom company Paltel made it even more complicated to convey details of the new stage of the military offensive.

  • Tavarin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The PA also did not want a two state solution, they wanted a one state solution that they controlled.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      what exactly are you talking about? are you just repeating stuff you heard that matches your notion of “all Muslims are evil and want to kill jews”?

      • Tavarin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        None of their negotiations gave Jews a right to the land. And Palestinians tried a total of 2 years of peaceful negotiations, not 10.

        And no, not all Muslims are bad, but the leadership in Palestine and Israel have never wanted the other religion to exercise any control in the region, and pretending Palestinians are completely innocent is idiotic.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          ok, so first off, what exactly are you basing your “worked towards a two-state solution” on? because it definitely has nothing to do with any of the treaties or actions to radicalize said treaties by the Palestinian people.

          And through your ignorance, purposeful or not, you straight up lie about the Palestinian government’s attempts at a two-state solution, fucking Netanyahu literally supported Hamas to undermine the two state efforts of the PA, what you claim just doesn’t match with any facts.

          • Tavarin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The PA only made efforts at peace for about 2 years, I ma basing it on that. 2 years out of the 75 that Israel has existed has had Palestine make legitimate attempts at a 2 state solution, not just a delaying tactic until they start attacking again.

            And Netanyahu is a shit-sack as well.

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              again, you repeat the 2 year number, what are you basing that on?

              In addition, seeing how the Palestinians actually followed through with their side of these negotiations(e.g. Palestine radicalize their first step of the Oslo accords while Israel only upped the settlements and martial law in response), I think it’s HIGHLY disingenuous to call it a delaying tactic, bordering on a bold faced lie. Further evidence that they actually are genuinely working towards a two-state solution is that the Israeli government supports Hamas to undermine these efforts.

              Simply put, congrats, you are a bigot because you seem to ignore facts while painting all Palestinians with the same negative brush.

              • Tavarin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                After losing against Israel for nearly 50 years, even though Palestine and the Arab nations started the conflicts against them. After spending nearly 50 years breaking ceasefires after Israel granted Palestine land back. Only after that did Palestine try and negotiate for peace, and their demands were that Israel give up a ton of land, and they Palestine super pinky swore they wouldn’t start attacking from it again like they did for the previous 50 years.

                Bad deal for Israel.

                • orrk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  technically Israel started the first war, this is what lead to the Suez crisis of the early Cold War.

                  the Palestinian position was that everyone go back to their own borders, tho if you consider all the territory legally gained via annexation (that Israel did, hence why they built permanent settlements in the Sinai Peninsula, and continue to build settlements) it may seem like they are having to “give up land” in the same way that Russia sees returning Crimea and the Donbas to Ukraine as “giving up a ton of land”.

                  Tho one would say that if it wasn’t for western aid to Ukraine it would have been a “good deal” for Russia to invade Ukraine, so are you on the Russian side of this conflict?

                  • Tavarin
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No Israel didn’t, the Arab coalition invaded the day Israel was created. The Arabs started the war.

                    And the Palestinian position was it’s all Palestine, Israel has to go.

                    And Israel took land after it was attacked by Palestine and the Arab league, Russia attacked first. So no, that’s an idiotic false equivalence.