A warning and a perspective from an insider who has been through this before.

  • floofloof
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Yes, and if it becomes really big, then every federated instance would find itself coping with large amounts of traffic passed to and from the big instances, and it will become difficult to run a small operation cheaply. At that point, only the big players with big money will be able to run sites in the Fediverse and it could end up mirroring what has happened to the rest of the internet.

    On balance I think it’s best if existing Fediverse instances don’t federate with the big corporations. But there are still other ways the corporations could sabotage this place, so the developers and the site admins need to be ready.

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      if it becomes really big, then every federated instance would find itself coping with large amounts of traffic passed to and from the big instances, and it will become difficult to run a small operation cheaply

      I think that’ where the biggest threat lies. How is a small operator going to keep up with the demands of a corporate server cluster with millions of users. A small operator would have to defederate. That puts us back to the crux of the original question, should corpos be allowed on the Fediverse. Why not save everyone the circle jerk and blacklist them from the start.

      A secondary threat is corporate sabotage of the ActivityPub protocol. They already have a track record of doing that to free and open standards.