Microsoft tries to dump S.F. office space amid tech industry cost-cutting::px-captcha

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now all companies should cut their office costs because I sure as shit ain’t going back to office. It’ll also help bankrupt some landlords (I hope)

      • masterspace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it will also lead to more vacant space in highly desired downtown cores that can be turned into residential units.

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly that’s always been a core problem of American cities vs other countries and part of what increases our car dependency. Other countries have mixed use urban areas that are resilient if one type is doing bad, whereas American cities have large divisions (housing, business, commercial) all separate, when there is a seismic change it leaves large sections of the city hurting.

        • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which will collapse the residential market with a supply glut. Which in SF might be a good thing.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Inb4 “BuT tHaT’s ToO eXpEnSiVe”.

          It’s not a valid excuse, to be sure, it’s just the most common one I see.

          • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is a non-trivial process. Commercial offices and residential apartments have very different code requirements.

            I’m all for doing it. I work from home myself and don’t know that I’ll ever take a job that requires a commute if I can help it.

            We should be realistic about it, however, and acknowledge that it’s not as simple as throwing up a few walls and doors and calling it a day.

            • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re right, there’s more to it than hanging extra doors. It’s going to cost money, which was my original statement, owners won’t do the renovations because it’s “too expensive” and keeping the status quo is cheaper.

        • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, I know there can be some good from it, I doubt it but it’s possible (the NIMBY is strong), but a collapsed commercial real estate market will have knock on economic effects elsewhere. Think housing bubble bad but maybe worse. Remember, before COVID, commercial real estate was essentially a “sure thing” investment wise. Everyone needed a job and every job needed a place for said job to be done. Now…now we all know for sure what we all suspected for years previously: we didn’t need to go to an office to do our jobs.

          I am in no way supporting landlords or anything. In fact I’m firmly in the “no one gets two until everyone has one” camp for housing along with removing the ability for companies to own single family housing. Just being a realist is all. And a pessimist.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      These places are beautiful. They should be opened to the public. Or maybe we should fund the parks system to create something similar.

    • skyspydude1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there are upsides and downsides to them, and I’d much rather work at and have to look at those, rather than miles and miles of soulless business parks or high rises, especially in areas where real estate isn’t at a premium.

  • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Such a weird interplay of land vs human capital. Like a company can afford either to fuck around with one cost, say expenses aligned toward real estate and all the trappings of a fancy office, or people…

    Both together just seems too much…

  • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dump it and build public housing to accommodate their labor demand instead of useless and wasteful structures, the office needs to die.