• frostbiker
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Were they doing a good job?

      Would you have the same laissez faire attitude if instead of proven jihadists these were radical christian supremacists that just came back from a modern crusade war?

        • frostbiker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That sounds reasonable.

          Have these particular jihadists reformed?

            • frostbiker
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the absence of further information, do you think it is fair to be wary of them being involved in the education of children?

              • FeminalPanda@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, education in any since, hell if they fought for isis and still are not remorseful I wouldn’t want them just walking around free.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably, the operative word in the headline is former

        If they’re conducting themselves professionally I don’t see any issues aside from any possible debts to society yet to be paid, which could frankly just as well be covered by them providing a professional education for the next generation.

        • letmesleep@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Probably, the operative word in the headline is former

          Yeah, but it’s likely that the people in question only returned a few years ago. I.e. they probably should only now be at the time where the jails are considering releasing them. Getting them position of power (in this case over children) now seems to be rushing things. After ten or twenty years of not showing any signs of fanatism I wouldn’t be bothered.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d be more-inclined to take issue with Muslim extremists than Christian extremists, if anything. So, yeah, probably have pretty much the same take.

        • frostbiker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would have the same opinion in both cases as well: I don’t want (former?) violent fundamentalists teaching my children, any more than I would like e.g. (former?) sex offenders.