Round 1: 200 votes for Jordan

Round 2: 199 votes for Jordan

Round 3: 194 votes for Jordan

Additional detractors this round:

Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA): Jordan round 2, McHenry round 3

Tom Kean Jr. (R-NY): Jordan round 2, McCarthy round 3

Marc Molinaro (R-NY): Jordan round 2, Zeldin round 3

Other GOP changes:

Wesley Hunt (R-TX): Jordan round 2, absent round 3

Derrick Van Orden (R-WI): Jordan round 2, absent round 3

  • OpenStars@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aside from the content, I want to take a moment to appreciate how this has such an informative title!:-)

        • kboy101222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Here, I’ll fix it:

          Oh no! Jim Jordan loses the Speaker vote for a third time! You won’t believe how many hold outs there were!

          Followed by 10 paragraphs of SEO ridden, AI generated drivel that buries the answer to the point you give up on finding it

          • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sums up internet articles in 2023, 95% of which could be less than a paragraph, but need to fluff it up to 6 pages to inlay some ads and get those juicy organic clicks

          • OpenStars@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tune in at 11 to find out how! … to access our video on the subject, which points to another webpage, which again links to a video, that again goes to a different story, hey this all seems familiar somehow…? :-P

            It’s our own damn fault I suppose, for engaging with it and thus not just allowing but outright making/encouraging it to happen.:-(

            Not that that excuses them for doing it though:-(.

  • squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 year ago

    The idea of Jordan being speaker was one of the stupidest and most offensive ideas they’ve come up with recently, so it’s nice that it isn’t working out.

  • demonquark@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read somewhere that a group of 55 republicans who plan to make sure he gets less votes every round. To rub in how much they don’t want him.

  • Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re doing it on purpose. There was a report a few days ago that outlined a plan to do exactly this. It will continue to get worse for him.

    • appel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I don’t get is if we know about this plan, surely gymbo must know as well. So why not just call it quits? Does he like to be humiliated? Is this some sort of fetish for him?

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those numbers are going in the wrong direction, guy. I think you should bow out. But I hope you’re dumb enough to keep going.

    Repubs are the greatest impediment to progress. Dems are the second greatest.

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then again, maybe if he keeps going he will unite everyone behind the banner of “Not Gym Jordan,” which is a great service he’s able to provide us.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this was ‘House of Cards’

    Dems would offer Blue state GOPs who voted for Jeffries easy wins in November. The ten or so voted he’d need would be offset by loses in other states.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if that’s a good idea honestly. First, they’d be giving up winnable seats in the future. Second, it’d be Democrats in charge of a republican controlled house. Sure, they could put up things they want for a vote, but stupid people would now think they’re responsible for the nothing that gets done. Letting Republicans tear each other apart is probably better politically without major concessions.

    • Pyr_Pressure
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Won’t the government be shutting down in like 3 weeks if they don’t choose a speaker?

      • xenoclast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They could keep going. I don’t think anyone involved in this farce knows or cares what happens to other people unless it directly benefits their wealth and power

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this was similar to the pope election, there would be a good deal of black smoke floating in the air.

    And things are getting bleaker for the runner at every new round.