• frostbiker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As a side note, why are you worried more about the rich than the poor?

    I am not. I’m offering the argument that a UBI may well lead to a less productive population, which makes it even harder to maintain a UBI in the first place.

    They will get UBI too so worst case they hit the same floor as everyone else.

    But if there are no longer rich people to be taxed because they have been sucked dry then there is no source to fund the UBI. Hence the notion that “rich people will fund the UBI” doesn’t fly. Not to mention that wealthy people find it relatively easy to move to other countries with less taxes.

    • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The UBI is funded by not having 23 different agencies each with their own staff, red tape, and costly vetting processes.

      There are more than a few studies already done on UBI and they all conclude it is a benefit. Stop asking everyone else to quench your curiosity and do the work yourself. Or are you currently receiving UBI and don’t want to do any work?

      Foh