• kent_eh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably.

    The judges in Trump’s various cases have to walk a fine line between justice being served and accusations of being politically aggressive against a high profile defendant.

    Accusations which could derail the case and do even more damage to trust in the judiciary and the overall rule of law.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      accusations of being politically aggressive against a high profile defendant

      Republicans already launch those accusations regardless of whether or not they have merit. Worrying about what Republicans are going to say is a losing game.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well it’s more about a mistrial. Anything that isn’t clear cut is going to be grounds for an appeal.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Republicans should be written off, but Enlightened Centrists matter (unfortunately). You want to keep the merit of the claims low enough that centrists can’t latch onto it for “both sides” purposes.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The centrists argue in bad faith all the time and say stupid shit without merit too, they’re just smarter about it.

          It’s time for us to ignore and dismiss them the way we do right-wingers.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            OK. Now we’ve ignored and dismissed 60% of the population. How do you propose to do that and still advance policy in a democracy?

            • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Rather than placating the right, you work too ridicule and humiliate them - make their stances unreasonable to sympathise with, let alone adopt.

              Then you’ve got to deal with the civility politics backlash, but how much has that ever really hurt the GOP - their base love it.