• worldwidewave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    365
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Israel has a right to self-defence, but it has to be done within international law … cutting water, cutting electricity, cutting food to a mass of civilian people is against international law,” said EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell on Tuesday (10 October).

    He repeated the view more than once in his press briefing. “The Palestinian people are also suffering,” he added.

    An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. This cycle of violence and repression needs to stop.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the point. The game is to be the last man standing with at least partial vision.

    • Locrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a pretty clown face move to attach those that supply your water, electricity and fuel.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        By that logic, the other way this ends is the dissolution of israel.

        They cant seem to stop themselves from murdering and pillaging their neighbors, right? So they have to go. Right? Thats matching your logic just fine.

      • davepleasebehave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        they really could have just left them alone. It would have been exactly the same result with the Palestinians blaming those in Palestine for their issues.

        instead they meddle and build illegal settlements.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s another possibility.

        Lebanon gets involved. Then Iran. Then the US. Then Iraq. Then Afghanistan. Then Russia. On and on until it’s WW3

        But no one wants to talk about that

        • renlok@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the EU and the US have managed to avoid getting directly involved in Ukraine Vs Russia and starting WW3 that way, there is no way this conflict will start anything that big.

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody talks about it, because it’s not realistic. This will be treated as another proxy war, with countries providing aid, but not actively fighting.

          The US and Russia are already involved. Russia likely started this mess, and US is already sending munitions to its ally.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What’s unlikely about Hezbollah getting involved? Or Iran? Or the Taliban?

            It can easily inflame into a massive regional war, and there go oil prices. With oil prices go food prices. With both, inflation slips out of control. Now there’s fuel shortages and hunger everywhere, heightening tensions.

            This is a powder keg. Wake up

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes I’m sure we need to care about great power Afghanistan “getting involved” in Gaza. We should also be wary of Mongolia, and probably Lesotho as well.

          Russia/Iran/US/EU are all already “involved” in with Israel. US/EU/Israel want to culturally genocide palestine and Russia/Iran want to hurt the US/EU. This isn’t ww3, and if push comes to shove none of the major players are going to start ww3 over Israel or Palestine.

      • faltryka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel isn’t just denying Hamas water, they are denying Palestinians water. That includes children and infants and uninvolved innocents.

                • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re making vague statements that the children of Gaza should be evacuated, but that’s not a solution unless you can tell me where they would be evacuated to.

                  There are two and a half million people in the Gaza Strip. What place is going to accept two and a half million Palestinian refugees? Bear in mind that millions of Palestinians have already ended up as refugees throughout the region and that is already considered a huge problem. Nobody wants even more to deal with. So what country? Even if there were magical teleporters to get them there and everyone was willing to leave their homes forever, who’s going to take them in and support them?

      • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Few people are worried about hamas. The concern is for the women and children. The people with no say in any of this. It’s not a crime to refuse to resupply an enemy, it is a crime to starve innocent people.

          • grte
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually the only hope of truly lasting peace is the dissolution of Israel and the creation of a new state that doesn’t limit citizenship and suffrage along ethnic or religious lines.

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I doubt that would work. If history is to be of any indication then Palestinians also have no desire to co-exist with Israel. If the sides were reversed Palestine would be doing the exact same things as Israel is doing. Arabs want Israel gone and it’s been clear since the state of Israel was officially founded in 1948.

            • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              This. Israel never should have been there in the first place. It’s stolen land, ruled by a tyrannical apartheid regime.

            • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I doubt Israel will be up for ‘dissolition’. The more achievable goal would be an end to violence and land grabs along an internationally recognized border.

              • grte
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Perhaps that’s true but that simply means Israel is not interested in truly lasting peace. Reconciliation is the only possible long term solution, just the same as in every other colonial project. After decades of settlement the Palestinian state would resemble Swiss cheese. It’s not feasible. A two state solution is only setting things up for further conflict down the road. As difficult as it would be, an egalitarian secular state is the only path forward.

          • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Noone wins a war of occupation. You either learn to live with conquered peoples and give them access tibequal rights (Roman empire) or completely erase the local population (Europeans in North America).

      • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same rhetoric as German occupiers claiming that they would not execute civilian hostages as long as Resistance fighters would give themselves up. Sorry for the Goldwyn point but you made it a low hanging fruit.

      • grte
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Damn, 1948 was a thousand years ago? Time is weird, I guess.

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you want to just count recent history, jews started buying land and returning to Palestine in the late 1800s. They started flooding in after some anti-semitic pogroms in the early 20th century and things have been spicy since.

          • grte
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            50
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This isn’t a conflict that was going on in the Ottoman period. This is a recent conflict and this attempt to turn it into a thousands year old religious war is bullshit. This is a colonial project where the goal is to take land. Very material in nature. That project has been in place since 1948.

              • grte
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Quite the opposite. I feel the same as you, both sides should be allowed to stay. What’s done is done and ethnically cleansing the area is obviously a horrific crime that oughtn’t be advocated for in either direction. Where we differ is that I see the two state solution as setting the region up for the same conflict down the road. After decades of settlement the areas which would make up the Palestinian state would be non-contiguous swiss cheese. It would be an untenable situation.

                Instead, a singular, secular, egalitarian state with universal suffrage and human rights guaranteed for all would be a challenging path, but I think ultimately a more stable one. And a path which would leave room for healing in the future.

              • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Bulshit. The diaspora started in 63BC, under Roman rule. Everybody could live peacefully side by side in one country, save for the religious nutheads pushing their hatred rhetoric

              • TGHOST-V0@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you really saying that Holocaust happened because of the Palestinians.

                Jews and Muslims were literally brother before all this western bullshit, so come on.

                Unbelievable 🙁

              • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Which country gets the Temple Mount?

                There’s a reason why every single non politician Palestinian who favors peace wants a single state. If material conditions persist what good will some embassies do Palestine?

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              1 year ago

              Debatable. The people who think it’s a millennia-long feud are counting from when the Romans threw the Israelites out of Israel according to the Bible. For them, protecting Israel at all costs is a religious thing, and their religion has existed for millennia, so 💁

              • grte
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                33
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Islam hadn’t even come about at that time, however, so people casting it as a religious war between Jews and Muslims come across as especially disingenuous if they try to frame it that way. Hell, the Romans hadn’t even Christianized at that time. Is it a war between Judaism and Paganism? C’mon.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You and I both know that, but the Bible - thumping loonies who support Israel’s corrupt government right or wrong don’t. They literally think that if the U.S. ever wavers or gives up support of the Israeli government in any way, it’ll bring on the end times and trigger the prophecies in the Book of Revelations.

                  🤔 I never used to put much stock into the argument that religion is dangerous, but seeing how it affects everyone else politically, I will have to concede that point. It is very dangerous to civil society. If that’s a authoritarian thing to say, it doesn’t really matter – the truth is inherently authoritarian in the minds of the weak.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The region of Israel was created in 1948 by stealing Palestinian land to give to white European Jews. It’s not a religious conflict, it’s European colonialism

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There have actually been plenty of periods of peace and tolerance in the middle east over the millennia. When these feuds break out people go back and dig up ancient reasons to justify them, but the feuds themselves are new and are not contiguous with those ancient ones.

        • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ehhhhh…when everyone reporting on it and everyone involved all acknowledge these old reasons as the root of the issue, I’m inclined to be