Not sure why this got removed from 196lemmy…blahaj.zone but it would be real nice if moderation on Lemmy gave you some sort of notification of what you did wrong. Like an automatic DM or something

    • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
      1·
      9 months ago

      Not really, if absolutely every single human at all stages of life believed it’s morally good to spit in their palm every day that would be an objective moral truth, there would be no subjectivity to it. For morals though no such thing exists.

      You don’t need to be able to observe it externally to distinguish it. For example i can say I have a conscious experience and that would be objectively true even though we have a pretty minimal understanding on what that really is or how to measure it.

        • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
          1·
          9 months ago

          You can measure brain activity but not consciousness. Consciousness is most likely an emerging property of brain activity but we can’t really say more with out current understanding of it.

            • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
              1·
              9 months ago

              What? I never said consciousness in supernatural, just that we have a poor understanding of it and no way to measure it. I was just using it as an example of an objective statement for something we can’t externally confirm.

                • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                  1·
                  9 months ago

                  Again, this is completely irrelevant to my original point…

                  What we consider consciousness to be is pretty broad, though self-awareness is a common one and that can’t be measured with any current instrument.