• atlasraven31@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    It would also help if expensive private jets and yachts had to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. Oil industries and others need to pay for their pollution too and certainly can’t claim government money as they pollute.

    • saigot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s kinda insane how many cruises there are that don’t even really make any stops. Just giant inefficient hotels. I feel like there has got to be a set of incentives to get rid of the majority of these a hotel with a no phone policy (or located somewhere remote) would replace 90% of the appeal.

      • prodigalsorcerer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Cruises have two major benefits (for the owner) over resorts:

        1. Their workers are half a step up from indentured servants.
        2. Land is expensive.

        There are cleaner fuels available, but they cost more, so it’s only used when not in international waters as mandated by the government of wherever they’re going. Until we, as a worldwide collective, agree to stop selling and using bunker fuel, there’s not a lot that can be done, because cruise ships are basically free money for their owners.