Republicans avoid shutdown by cutting deal with Democrats over their own party’s hardliners

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Headline makes it sound like it’s done, this is just a temp budget:

    Republicans now have 45 days to pass longer-term budget measures to operate the government for the 2024 year. Those budgets have already hit their own set of roadblocks in the House, and are destined to run up against a Democratic-controlled Senate and White House that will likely demand changes.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a continuing resolution. This is exactly what I’ve been expecting. I personally didn’t think they’d pass a final budget.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just a 45 day stopgap and it’s not over, but hopefully Republicans begin to realize, “We can’t function with these people,” and start trying to move away from their hardliners. Doubtful it’ll happen, but one can always dream. That they didn’t actually let it go to a shutdown suggests that there’s Republicans who wanted to avoid a shutdown as much as Democrats and may be willing to compromise and reach a longer term deal, they’re not just trying to burn the whole place down.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It didn’t read that way to me. This could be the end of McCarthy as speaker because he worked with Democrats. Did you see the paragraph:

      Jim McGovern, a Democrat from Massachusetts, offered a simple commentary as he left the floor following the vote: “We won.”

      • thisisthelastonebtw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The headline made it sound like the Republicans avoided it; that’s all. You know most Republicans don’t read anything more than a headline. :) I’m mostly frustrated with that is all. The context almost always leans differently.

        Republicans avoid shutdown by cutting deal with Democrats over their own party’s hardliners

        Any Republican who reads that, what do you think they read? I know what I think, and, unfortunately, as an observer of those people’s reactions, I’m positive that’s how they’ll read it.

        • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well Republicans control the house so it was factually a Republican who sided with Democrats over the Republican freedom caucus.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not my take away from the headline at all. Makes the GOP sound like they don’t have their shit together so McCarthy had to go hat in hand to the Dems seeking actual adults capable of governing.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, while most of the GOP might have their shit together, they have a crazy faction blocking them

        In a way, it might just be possible that this marks a realization that they will have better results working in a bipartisan manner than trying to appease the nutjobs.

        • thisisthelastonebtw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          How in the world can you say most of the GOP has their shit together when all they’ve done is support Trump? Block anything Democrat backed? I don’t understand where you’re coming from at all.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Have their shit together meaning they can actually function as a coherent group to achieve actually getting something done, whether I agree with them or not. When you toss the “Freedom Caucus” into the fray and if you refuse to work at all with democrats, then the party “does not have their shit together” insofar as they can’t pass anything. To try to pick their own speaker they utterly struggled.

            Here they wanted the government to keep functioning by and large, but a small contingent just wants to burn everything down. The fact that the larger population of GOP were willing to work with Democrats rather than try to appease the nutjob wing is evidence that they “have their shit together” enough to actually get something passed they wanted to get passed.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well technically they did work hard… at blocking anything possible to stop this shutdown, because a shutdown is good for a very few rich assholes

    • twistypencil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but they can’t win this, so either have to damage themselves over and over again, or grow up and be leaders of their constituents, which means explaining a little bit to them reality instead of blindly being pushed around by ignorant sheep

  • maporita@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is that this solves nothing. Since COVID the US has been writing checks it cannot cash and the party will come to an end sooner or later. The longer we kick the can down the road the more painful it will be. Republicans won’t increase taxes (even Biden didn’t roll back Trump’s tax cuts). And Democrats won’t cut entitlement spending. So we are essentially screwed.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re absolutely right that projecting our current debt and revenue unchanged into the future looks disastrous. HW Bush raised taxes and it very likely contributed to his reelection loss. Clinton raised taxes and balanced the budget. I think it’s definitely possible to begin paying off the debt in such a way that doesn’t crush the economy with an austerity backlash. Both of those presidents’ tax increases didn’t kill the economy. It took W Bush’s “ownership society” deregulation to do that.

      There’s also the possibility of a future economic shift that could put everything as we know it in flux: a new energy source, automation that replaces overseas manufacturing, or asteroid mining are all examples of things that are at least possible if not plausible to be on the horizon. Not too mention something we can’t even conceive of. Very few people in 1900 would predict the model T was on the horizon.

      I’m definitely apprehensive about the economic future but I’m personally not terrified that it’ll be some kind of doomsday.

      • MisterD
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Re: New energy source thing, Australia is reporting people charging their cars for free.