I mainly use imgur to upload screenshots using sharex, would appreciate being pointed in the direction of any alternative.

  • Windshear
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As someone who doesn’t know, what’s wrong with imgur?

    Edit: Thanks for the info guys.

    • idle@158436977.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imgur announced recently they are going to be purging images that haven’t been viewed for x amount of time.

      • coldblade2000@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Haven’t they always, though? Pretty sure since the beginning it purged anything that hasn’t been viewed for something like 6 months or so. That’s why you got a lot of dead links in old Reddit (or others) posts

        • Jadey ()@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think so, I’ve never had this happen in the few cases where I revisited an imgur url after years of not visiting it

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re just shitposting dank memes, having the pictures deleted after a while shouldn’t be a big problem. If you’re posting something a bit more valuable, consider keeping the pictures on flickr or even pixelfed.

        • parlaptie@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is pixelfed really a good way to prevent dead links? I don’t know much about it other than that it’s part of the fediverse, so I’d assume any pictures hosted there last only as long as the instance they’re posted to.

            • parlaptie@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I suppose you’re right, though that’s quite involved when all I want is to host an image.

              • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Using flickr or google would be a lighter option. If you put some pictures in a place like that, they are probably going to stay there, but the TOS does leave a very convenient backdoor open. If flickr messes up a database migration, or the datacenter gets hit by a meteor one day, and all of your photos disappear, you can’t hold them accountable. Every option has some issues…

      • bouncing@partizle.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not necessarily a bad thing, as long as you aren’t using it for archival purposes. I would prefer not everything I post live forever.

        • StateParkMasturbator@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I’d agree for identifying pictures, image hosting that suddenly doesn’t one day becomes a huge problem for a lot of old tutorial-based content. Look at any old car forum for examples.

          • SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was thinking about this problem recently after I got an email from photobucket that I was over the new limit of photos. I think a more appropriate place to host tutorial content would be on GitHub.

    • boogers19@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      They just stopped hosting porn. Dont know why OP is asking but quite a few people were scrambling for a replacement a couple of weeks ago on reddit.

    • gabuwu@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looks interesting and I will def be joining, but it does seem more instagramy than specifically free image hosting.

        • bouncing@partizle.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but most (all?) pixelfed instances are run by volunteers. If someone’s using their instance just to hotlink images elsewhere, an admin might decide it’s not worth it.

          Of course, that’s true for just using a pixelfed instance for its documented purpose, but at least then you’re probably privy to what’s being discussed on the instance in terms of server costs, etc.

    • Enfield [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Catbox is a robust looking option that I’ve experimented with. I’m a bit concerned that they’re blocked in a few countries, though.

      Blocked countries, sourced from above FAQ
      • Australia: DNS block. “Decided that Catbox was a terrorist propaganda spreading website.” Explicitly defining DNS serves to a public server is required to access site and files.
      • Ireland/UK: IP block. “Clips of [football] games being uploaded to Catbox.” VPN required to access site and files.
      • Iran: IP block. “Uknown, but I’m sure you can probably make some pretty accurate guesses.” VPN required.
      • Afghanistan: Ditto above.

      I’m not sure if that would be a massive issue for most Beehaw users, but personally I’m not a fan of having content potentially inaccessible or at least requiring additional tools to access.

      Otherwise I couldn’t recommend Catbox enough, which is what really bums me out. Massive uncompressed file sizes, indefinite file retention, wide file support, direct file linking, the place has the works. If Catbox wasn’t already blocked to a mild degree in the mentioned countries, I would be all in on recommending them.

      Related: If anyone is in one of the listed countries above, I’d appreciate it if you tried to access the site and some direct file links and reporting back if a VPN or public DNS is indeed required. There’s the catbox test Millions has below and I have a file of my own for good measure.

  • jherazob@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been considering to self-host, Imgur clearly no longer wants to be in the image hosting business and wants to focus on their “community” instead

    • steakfries@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      do they have a sizable community? honestly i just assumed it was almost exclusively used for image hosting.

      • Jurisprudentia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s home to a very strange community that was unaware that their “platform” was just an image host for users of an actual social media platform. Well, at least it was before imgur recently started adding social media features and purged nsfw content.

        Popular image posts from reddit would routinely get boosted (sans context) to the top of imgur’s homepage, attracting confused, angry, and often unintentionally hilarious comments from imgur users. Iirc there was a subreddit dedicated to this phenomenon.

        • loops@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          adding social media features and purged nsfw content

          I mean, those are both pretty much the same thing these days.

  • bouncing@partizle.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you want something very cheap (though not necessarily totally free), and within your control, just get an AWS S3 bucket and put them there. Or possibly Backblaze.

    • Enfield [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, I’m gradually shifting to S3 for my public direct file sharing as a bit of an exercise in learning AWS. It’s not free, but 99.99% of the time it’s remarkably cheap. If you’re willing to put up with learning AWS (or any other general-purpose platform really, cloud or self-hosted,) there’s a nice feeling that comes with having more leniency to do things your way and on your terms.

      Now whether it works properly, however, let alone work at all, is an entirely different story. But that’s the double-edged sword with going out on your own: it’s more likely to be your fault, not someone else’s.

      id be pretty psyched if my video embedding starts working one of these days 👨‍💻

  • amortized_cost@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure about the longevity but a lot of people use discord as CDN apparently. There’s even an API for that.

    • Communist@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      We should really try to stick to federated FOSS choices, so that we don’t have a future nightmare on our hands.

      • amortized_cost@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s there to federate about image cdn? If you don’t want to use 3rd party service just self host. You just have to make compromises either way.

        • Communist@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We actually feature a federated image hosting service on lemmy, there isn’t much to image hosting to federate, you’re right, but we shouldn’t rely on imgur or discord or anything centralized wherever possible to avoid centralization of control over our media.

          • veaviticus@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            What’s really the difference between a federated Lemmy instance for hosting vs a 3rd party anyways?

            If another Lemmy instance goes down, all the content on it is gone anyways. Federated != Mirrored. Just because you can browse the content doesn’t mean it’s safe from going away at the whims of one person

            • Communist@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s very true, but i’m opposed to giving discord and imgur even more power over the media posted to it.

              Again, image hosting is a very minimally federated thing, and it’s one of the areas where it makes the least difference, but regardless, we should strive to avoid centralization wherever possible.

              Also, I think it’s possible to create a federated automatically mirrored alternative, I wonder if there’s potential there, I don’t know!

  • aponigricon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    No they don’t? 🤔 I’m pretty sure they did once, but right now I am able to upload images with no account. Just dragging the file into the browser window works.