I mainly use imgur to upload screenshots using sharex, would appreciate being pointed in the direction of any alternative.

  • idle@158436977.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imgur announced recently they are going to be purging images that haven’t been viewed for x amount of time.

    • coldblade2000@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haven’t they always, though? Pretty sure since the beginning it purged anything that hasn’t been viewed for something like 6 months or so. That’s why you got a lot of dead links in old Reddit (or others) posts

      • Jadey ()@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think so, I’ve never had this happen in the few cases where I revisited an imgur url after years of not visiting it

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re just shitposting dank memes, having the pictures deleted after a while shouldn’t be a big problem. If you’re posting something a bit more valuable, consider keeping the pictures on flickr or even pixelfed.

      • parlaptie@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is pixelfed really a good way to prevent dead links? I don’t know much about it other than that it’s part of the fediverse, so I’d assume any pictures hosted there last only as long as the instance they’re posted to.

          • parlaptie@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I suppose you’re right, though that’s quite involved when all I want is to host an image.

            • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Using flickr or google would be a lighter option. If you put some pictures in a place like that, they are probably going to stay there, but the TOS does leave a very convenient backdoor open. If flickr messes up a database migration, or the datacenter gets hit by a meteor one day, and all of your photos disappear, you can’t hold them accountable. Every option has some issues…

    • bouncing@partizle.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not necessarily a bad thing, as long as you aren’t using it for archival purposes. I would prefer not everything I post live forever.

      • StateParkMasturbator@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I’d agree for identifying pictures, image hosting that suddenly doesn’t one day becomes a huge problem for a lot of old tutorial-based content. Look at any old car forum for examples.

        • SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was thinking about this problem recently after I got an email from photobucket that I was over the new limit of photos. I think a more appropriate place to host tutorial content would be on GitHub.