• CanIFishHere
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Goal achieved from a bit of smoke and mirrors:

    “The benchmark was partly achieved by an internal reorganization of the federal government, which has seen some agencies, such as the Canadian Coast Guard, moved under the auspices of the Defence Department and therefore counted toward the NATO target. It was also achieved through a substantial pay raise for members of the military and by pouring money into base infrastructure and overhaul.”

  • twopi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It looks like the new target is 5%

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      More like 3% and another 2% is for infrastructure. You only need to pretend that that infrastructure is really badly needed for defense, which is rather easy for a lot of it. Like say those are not metro stations, they are bunkers…

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      2% is quite a lot. 5% is madness. I hope that the costs of it start to become apparent to everyone and they reverse course well before they go that far.

      • corsicanguppy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Roadways are defence infrastructure.

        Water is defence infrastructure.

        Power is defence infrastructure.

        Resilient rail is definitely defence infrastructure.

        It’s very easy to get that other 3% – and actually get sovereign rail from coast to coast to coast at the same time, which we’d never get if it wasn’t a defence project.