• c0mpost@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s all about nuclear power. All nations in the Security Council have the power to end civilization with nuclear weapons. That’s what this war is about as well, Russia is just showing it can do as it pleases. There can be no democracy with such disparity of bellic power, that’s the reason that institution exists and it’s foolish to assume Russia could be expelled.

    • bionicjoey
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nuclear power is unrelated to the security Council permanent members. They were simply the world powers that won WWII. At the time, many of them didn’t have nukes yet.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It is, however, one of the reasons people occasionally agitate to remove Russia because it wasn’t Russia that won WW2.

          It was the USSR, a major component of such being Ukraine.

      • c0mpost@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You have a point. India and Pakistan are out of the Security Council because they are underdeveloped and are busy having their nuclear missiles aimed at each other. North Korea has at most only a couple of ICBMs and is unable to destroy our entire civilization, even though it can create a lot of destruction with those. That is the most troublesome of nations for the UN, because they don’t give a fuck about rules and are slowly increasing their bellic power, thus all the fuss about them improving their nuclear program with the help of Russia. Geopolitics is fun.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am going to guess that Russia would veto that resolution…

    The only way to get rid of the veto powers would be to setup a completely different institution. That would be nice but it will never happen.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    He thinks Ukraine is anything more than a condom for Anglo empire to have a sex intercourse session with Russia. Has he not learnt anything from the recent celebrity meet/conference he went to, where he was standing alone like a grumpy creepy loner?