• SGH Fan@lemdro.idOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Forgot that. Actually, the Redmi Note 12 that I’m typing this on actually has one! But in the US, yeah.

    • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I was not missing it for about a couple years but now I’m missing it again, it was just so damn good and like why can’t our monitors and PCs get IR receiver then we would be about to use a remote to play/pause, control volume, and forward and rewind things on it (yes you can also use wifi based apps, but I don’t want to set up an ad hoc network every time I need it or connect to an open WiFi)

      P.S. I’m aware my idea isn’t the best, but it’s just the perfect mix of convenience and usability for me

      • runjun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I was annoyed when they removed it but a lot of electronics did add apps for the electronics so it wasn’t a huge deal then. But between the poor performance and privacy issues of the apps, I really miss the IR blaster.

      • Quacksalber@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Shouldn’t it be possible to just use one of the cameras or even the light sensor as receiver and the screen as sender? At that point, you only need software support.

        • cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          well, maybe. Neither cameras nor screens are optimized for the infrared spectrum (in fact, cameras in particular filter it). So that might be possible but I wouldn’t bet on it

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Might not be as reliable and will be less efficient in just trying to encode and decode messages in them without needing an epilepsy warning every time you use it.

          Edit: unless you meant generating and reading IR through them, in which case it might not work at all

    • thecitywelivein@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I just bought a USB C adapter two weekends ago. Lives on my keychain for when I’m somewhere with a TV that’s a little too loud.

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you really want to control your TV from your phone, why not just use an app to control it over the local network that’s probably available if your TV has been released in the past 10 years or so? Doesn’t even have to be in line of sight for that.

      • runjun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        In my experience, the apps are extremely spotty. That’s besides privacy concerns.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The “bare minimum for a non-disposable, consumer friendly, half environmentally responsible phone” starter pack.

    Also the custom ROM ability should not be merely a bonus. IMO it needs to be legally mandatory even above standardised charging connectors. It costs effectively nothing to implement because the base OS and general architecture supports it by default, the manufacturer simply needs to not disable it, and it is by far the most important thing for keeping a device from becoming unusable and possibly even a cybersecurity risk with age. Also just in principle, I paid for the hardware I should be able to put my own software on it.

      • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Remember when Samsung used to advertise repairibility, storage expansion, replaceable battery as selling points over the iPhone? iFixit used to have them as a gold example of a high end and repairible smartphone back in like 2014/2015, and they were the most popular CyanogenMod devices other than the OnePlus One for quite a while, and even then only because the OnePlus One came with it while Samsung phones were the most popular for users separately installing the ROM. Then they basically went and made the Android iPhone smh

    • larsanders@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      yup imagine not being able to run anything you want on your own device. it should be mandatory

    • CandyPants@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      10 months ago

      I agree! And it flashed different colors for different notifications! Things were awesome!