• Splitdipless
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In fact, if Canada goes with a “President,” it would cost more. Just on the election alone, but then they will also need an enlarged staff for their political works. Also, electing a President has really been working out well elsewhere, like the USA, hasn’t it?

    • Auli
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We could have a President that is ceremonial like the Governor General now. Which means this hole thing would be pointless just to change the name of some position.