• Splitdipless
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In fact, if Canada goes with a “President,” it would cost more. Just on the election alone, but then they will also need an enlarged staff for their political works. Also, electing a President has really been working out well elsewhere, like the USA, hasn’t it?

      • Auli
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We could have a President that is ceremonial like the Governor General now. Which means this hole thing would be pointless just to change the name of some position.