• Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If the charity itself is doing proper work, that makes sense tbh. I mean, if you had billions to donate, would you give it to some random ass organisation… Or set up your own thing to do things that you personally agree with?

      • Ichi_matsu@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed, and I’m find with the tax deduction if the charity works they do is legit, it’s not like he is paying taxes anyway.

          • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is exactly the issue. He doesn’t “donate” shit. He opens a non-profit that does nothing but funnel his fortune to his children. It’s all a sham. Same as with that other clothing company who “donated” their entire fortune.

            • Kelsenellenelvial
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not sure about elsewhere, but in Canada a Charity is a special kind of non-profit that has more public oversight as to how they manage their money, and allowed to write charitable receipts. Non-profits might do some good things, but you don’t get a tax credit for donating money to them, and there’s less oversight of how they’re managed.

      • SomeoneElseMod@feddit.ukOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, I’d go for the middle option: donate to existing charities that appeal to me. I don’t want to run a charity, it sounds like a massive headache.

        • Kelsenellenelvial
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re probably a different demographic. I’d guess the kind of people that become billionaires, assuming they actually want to be philanthropic, think that they can do a better job of managing their charities than existing charities would do managing their donations.

          • SomeoneElseMod@feddit.ukOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s definitely fair to say I’m in the “extremely unlikely to ever be a millionaire, let alone a billionaire” demographic!

    • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean if you donate billions you kinda don’t want someone do a extit scam or it going to some very sketchy places… Tax reduction is a point but pretty far down the list.

      And even if its for tax purposes, the money is then tied to certain purposes and will definitely do more good than as regular taxes. (and its way more than regular taxes)

      Man i hate that guy but this bashing isn’t justified.

      • SomeoneElseMod@feddit.ukOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wasn’t bashing him, just providing additional information as the headline is makes him sound like an altruistic hero “uniting humanity”. He isn’t. He will benefit from this in one way or another or else he wouldn’t do it.

  • Perfide@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m so fucking sick of all these billionaires “pledging” their fortunes. “I promise to donate all my wealth when I die” then fucking do it you cowards, die already.

    • Bricktamland29@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They donate their wealth to avoid taxes. Basically their families control the foundations, they donate and avoid a whole shit ton of taxes their next of kin get the money from the foundation.

      Adam Conover did a video on it.

        • Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, Gates is older and has shown more commitment to the idea than most. I still wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him but the foundation has done some good things for a long time. And maybe with fewer self-aggrandizing press stories compared to others.

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            How do you go and, true to the expression, really throw someone?

            Does it imply throwing a human being as we’d throw a log? Perhaps a brick? I’d expect it involves a lot of physical strenght. And does it imply being from a stationary position?

            Does throwing someone down a window or from a moving car or perhaps a boat count?

            It intrigues me.

            • stjobe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Left hand by the scruff, right hand by the belt, lift, swing forward, back, forward, and release. Easy :)

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They give away all their money so they don’t have to give away some of their money. Then they commit crimes so their kids can… have the money they gave away to not give away.

        What a take lol

    • average_internet_enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s not forget, that while they “pLeDgE”, they are also literally fucking their workers at the same time and expect that it all cancels out…

  • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the same thing that other billionaire did with his fortune. Gave 3 billion “away” to his own charity so his kids could inherit without paying a penny in taxes.

    I make under 200k and the highest bracket I hit is 51% of my salary. Warren buffet has paid less than 10% taxes on his entire fortune. They’re playing us, the new cool thing is just to say it’s for the climate.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bezos pledged 40 billion (maybe 20, can’t remember) I believe in 2019.

      To date he has actually donated less than $200 million of it IIRC to any climate-related funds.

      It’s just a bold face lie, not even taking his own charity scams into account.

      Edit: also side rant: I have gotten a lot of wallstreetbets armchair investors in the past saying “b-b-but muh liquid vs assets, he would crash amazon stock.”

      Bezos has liquidated a minimum of $12 billion per year without even a slight blip in amazon stock. PLENTY to fulfil his pledge. People don’t understand the scale of sold shares. The stock market is completely speculative bs. If he liquidated every stock of amazon in a short time after an anouncement like this, investors would absolutely speculate that it would recover, the price would lower for a week or so while every hedge fund in existence rushes to buy every single stock that they have and voila, it would magically recover within a month and bozo would not be a complete lying scumbag. It would probably cause him to be audited though which is every bilionaire’s nightmare because they have all done such shady things and dodges so many taxes for so many years. At least if the IRS had any balls.

      • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s tax “brackets”. So from say 20-30k you’re taxed ~21%, the following 30-50k you make is taxed at another amount like 30%, and so forth. The last 30k made from 160-190k is then taxed at 49% (51% because I’m taking a bit more money instead of dumping into my pension fund etc…)

        And yeah it’s Canada, but in the province of Quebec, the most taxed province of all (where education is still heavily subsidized/ free for people born there etc…)…

        I’ve done this whole exercise on /r/theydidthemath years ago on reddit comparing to the US, and with all the medical insurance garbage they have there like co-pays after deductibles, tax credits, dental, daycares, tolls/infrastructure etc… It amounts to roughly the same as the taxation + private insurance in the US. It just “looks worse” because it’s all mostly up front. I know ex-millionaires in the US who were basically homeless because they had a sick baby who needed to stay in the hospital for a year after birth. It cost them 5 million dollars to keep the baby alive without having to go to court with the insurer. This doesn’t happen in Canada.

        I’m fine with it, I just want the rich assholes to pay the same. I live very comfortably, bought a home in February this year and have more than enough.

        • kbotc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing you drug up about the US hasn’t been a thing for more than a decade. The individual out of pocket limit is $9,450 this year for an individual, and Pregnancy, maternity, and newborn care are considered “essential health benefits” so as long as it was an actual factual real health plan and not something like a health care sharing ministry, there’s no way you’re going in a millionaire and coming out destitute unless you did something phenomenally dumb like demand an NICU be built into your house. Out healthcare is broken in so many ways, but the bandaids do exist on the system.

          • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I have no idea what his situation was, he had full healthcare. There’s the law, and then there’s bringing insurance companies to court over the law. This might have been about a decade ago.

            An out-of-pocket maximum is a cap, or limit, on the amount of money you have to pay for covered health care services in a plan year.

            The key word being “covered health care services”. This also does not cover their own expenses, loss of salary etc… These laws are intentionally complicated so it’s theoretically possible to be covered, but good fucking luck going through the loops.

            You can still find studies that claim that over 500k people file for bankruptcy every year due to accumulating medical costs I’m sure all these people are stupid and had NICUs built in their homes…

          • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eeee. Youre completing forgetting that he can BORROW against those stocks, and pay a measly interest rate, paying out when it’s convenient through various loops of the tax system. Warren Buffet, even if his worth in billions is not in his pocket, has contributed less than most relative to his income.

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Might be Canada, I’m in a similar situation and GTFOing. No way am I going to continue paying this much in tax but still lack quality education and healthcare for our kids.

        • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you/your children Quebec citizens? Education and healthcare are very cheap and accessible. If you’re a foreigner here then yeah it might not be as easy. Healthcare is still free and medicine is subsidized to a minimum of 80%. Also medicine potency is regulated, knock off brands of “advil” are guaranteed to be as potent as the brand name, which is a huge plus and keeps medicine costs very low.

          I have a lot of experience with the medical system in canada; my parents both died of cancer, so did my mentor, and were in treatment in the public system the same week they got diagnosed. They didn’t wait months to see specialist like is often thrown around on reddit.

        • someguy3
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah instead in the US you get to pay healthcare insurance premiums instead and have the companies try every trick to deny your healthcare claims. And pay who knows how much for your kids education, tens of thousands a year. All so your marginal (not effective) tax rate is what 40% instead? I think you need to recheck your math and your outrage. Don’t forget those expenses are after tax.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless he’s donating everything tomorrow, this is all bullshit.

    First off he doesn’t have 124 billion. He is WORTH 124 billion, the vast majority of it being the worth of his stakes in Amazon. If he sells all his stakes in it, the Amazon worth would plummet and he’d be worth a fraction of what he’s worth today.

    But lets say he has a 124 billion dollars. If he gives out 10 millions every day it will still take over 300 years. In that time his worth likely would.grow faster than he’s spending it so in 300 years he’d still be worth more than he is today.

    All this charity stuff is bullshit, TAX THE RICH. Taxes will give honest amounts of money to governments who can then use that money for universal healthcare, universal education, universal income…

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sacrifice the profits of parasitic shareholders for the good of society, returning America to the level of taxation when it’s economy was great, putting the money back in the hands of the workers that keep the economy running? The workers that will spend their money, stimulating the economy (unlike shareholders)?

      No - that’s impossible! Pay no attention to the 90% top tax rate implemented by Eisenhower - a goddamn Republican.

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was a favor 10 off but that doesn’t matter, the point still stands.

          No single person should be ever control that much money

        • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But while he gives away 3.65 billion a year, his remaining 120 billion appreciated to 130 billion or whatever. Then the next year he gives away 3.65 billion and his remaining 126 billion appreciated to 136 billion…

          As long as he doesn’t give away more than his principal gains, it’s an indefinite loop.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      governments who can then use that money for universal healthcare

      Press X to doubt

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fun fact: we could having universal healthcare right now and both businesses and individuals would make more money. We don’t because voters are dumb and can’t do math.

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fun fact: it’s not that easy. It’s likely possible and likely great for everyone but it’s also an enormous undertaking that you don’t want to fail. It would take years if not decades to implement, don’t ever think it’s easy.

          I’m all for it, but it’s not a “we could do it now”

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not that easy, which is why every comparable country does it 🤷🏻‍♂️

            You’re right though, it wouldn’t be easy because we built a monster of a insurance industry that’s in the way that nobody wants to dismantle because muh profit

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m all for taxing the rich but the rest of this is just pure stupidity.

      Like why did you cap how much he can give away at one time lol

      • Setnof@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Try to sell all your stocks at once if you own a big chunk of all available shares. The stock price would fall faster than you were able to sell your shares.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bezos already engages in structured stock sell-offs worth vastly more than $10MM

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I didn’t cap anything. There are realistic limits to what you can give to charity. Give a charity that normally gets a few millions a billion and they won’t be able to spend it in any normal way. Breeds corruption, etc.

        Charity shouldn’t even exist, as it is always this patch on holes left by governments. Tax the rich until they are “normal rich” and then use that money for projects that normally would require charity

        Also, his wife actually had the exact same situation I just described. She spent millions over millions and once done she had more wealth than she started with

          • Phoenixz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No.

            If only governments would tax the rich properly they’d have enough money to put good social programs in place. We wouldn’t need charity.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There will always be a use of some sort of charity until we live in a post-scarcity world.

  • Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. The government should take it from him as taxes that he avoided. So the people can decide how best to invest it instead of over egomaniac with a history is abusing his people.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be honest, going all toward climate change seems better than what the government would use it for. That being said, he should definitely pay more taxes.

      • ToastedRavioli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude for sure is going to spin up his own charities with lofty mission statements that he “donates” to which exclusively pitch solutions that require a lot of investment in his for-profit endeavors.

        Don’t mistake money laundering for benevolence.

      • puppy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know he’s not really giving it away, right? I bet my bottom dollar that his assets are being transferred to a fund he controls. Because the fund is categorised non-profit, it will receive max tax write-offs.

        His ex-wife on the other hand, has given away butt load of money to actual charities.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah if it actually goes towards climate change and “uniting humanity” that’s way better than giving it to any government.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          And if it isn’t done with anti-public stuff on the side. Take bill gates, he funded a Covid vaccine which is great! But strings were attached, namely they were required to patent it. His charity consistently mandates ownership of intellectual property and partnerships with corporations. I fear something similar with bezos. You’re gonna need new technology and a push against overconsumption to do Jack shit against climate change. I fully expect him to not permit that new technology to reject patent or use a copyleft style license agreement. And I don’t believe the owner of Amazon will promote things like creating a society where we only work 20 hours and consume less low quality goods, instead opting for long lasting and repairable things that end up using less natural resources in the long run. Instead I expect him to throw billions at carbon capture, which is needed and can be done responsibly (especially if we build a strategic biofuel reserve), but is also the carbon equivalent of trying to out exercise your fork.

      • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jeff bezos funds a study how to fight climate change. Study finds humanity needs to decrease their usage of energy drastically and stop consumerism as we are doing it right now. Jeff bezos: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)

    • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US government? LOL. How much of the taxes goes to fossil fuel and corn subsidies and to the military industrial complex?

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The majority of our taxes goes to social programs and healthcare. Military spending is insane, but we have to keep in mind that taxing billionaires will absolutely bring benefits to the common folks.

    • zib@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree in principle, but the government would take the money and allocate 99% of it to the military budget rather than do anything useful with it.

      • CountZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, the government generally has a plan and definite budget for their money, which includes social programs and infrastructure. You can debate about how good it is, but at least it’s there.

        Giving money to a charity directly controlled by them (or their kids, or one of their billionaire friends) might just make that money disappear.

  • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I pledge to not post this comment…whoops, darn, oh well. I tried.

    bezos is a cuntasaurus, I’ll never forget when Shatner was trying to share his feelings about the genuine experience of going into space, and cuck-lord bezo not only interrupts shatner, he sullies the moment by acting like a sore winner

    • rckclmbr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve hated bozos since forever, but this right here was unforgivable. Shatner trying to give inspiration after a really being in space, after a lifetime of being an icon? You fucking listen

  • Not A Bird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    What that means is he will invest that much in energy related projects during the course of his life. He did this the last time as well. He is not giving his money away. We are just used to turd ass quality journalism.

  • Echo71Niner@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s all fucking BS and theatrics, it’s easy to promise shit AFTER YOU DIE.

      • Echo71Niner@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol you are a silly person. You must think if he liquidated his asset he will walk away with $124 billion dollar, don’t you? So silly… lol Once he is caught selling his stocks, so will the market sell theirs, and his stock will become worth pennies in no time, before he even clears his first stock-block sale. None of these billionaires are worth the tag assigned to them, that is a market value so long they stay in the game lol

  • orangatang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    lol, “Pledge” just means, I might do it, so you can write a nice fluff peace on me and then I just conveniently forget to “Pledge” x amount.

  • TheLurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sure you are Bezos you pathetic cunt rag.

    Fuck I want to punch him in the face. You can feel the smugness oozing out of every god damn picture taken of him.

  • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    He should divide all the money on all the people that ever worked for him and give them each a piece.