- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
To me any war on homeland soil would mostly mean crippling infrastructure via hacking & inciting unrest. Worst case scenario a strategic nuclear or emp strike on military sites though by that stage we’re clearly in a very worrying place.
crippling infrastructure via hacking & inciting unrest.
That’s happening since 2014. They mean boots on the ground war
The UK must “actively prepare” for a potential “wartime scenario” in its homeland, the National Security Strategy has warned.
The review highlighted Russia and Iran as potential threats, including saying that the latter’s “hostile activity” on British soil is increasing in an effort to “silence critics” as well as “directly threatening the UK”.
If you read the article that they’re linking to, it does say that this is a “low probability” scenario.
“We are trying to raise awareness through this war game to say, look, let’s have a look at what might happen,” he said.
“Unlikely and low probability though it is, so that we can start to put some measures in place and remind ourselves about how we used to do it - use history as our weapon, if you like, in that regard.”
Russia has aimed to assassinate people on British soil and has engaged in sabotage in Europe, but that’s also a long way away from what I’d call a real wartime situation.
Vice asked a guy at Jane’s to do an assessment of whether Russia could do an invasion of the UK a decade back. He said that Russia likely could:
The requirements for carrying out a successful invasion are pretty substantial, which makes the list of realistic threats to Britain quite small. The bigger military powers are an obvious contender to begin with; the USA and Russia have certainly got the manpower and capability to carry it out but China, for example, doesn’t yet have a global reach and couldn’t support enough troops and aircraft that far from home to make it viable without support.
That being said, that was also pre-Russo-Ukraine War, and that may have altered things (China’s certainly built up her military a lot over that decade). Might be interesting to go back to Jane’s and ask for an updated assessment.
Iran could engage in terrorism, maybe smuggle some weapons in, but doesn’t have the force projection capability to engage in much by way of conventional war on the UK territory. Iran’s current ballistic missiles don’t have the range to reach the UK from Iranian territory, so unless they can launch them from ships or aircraft or closer territory, they aren’t in the picture…and while you could probably hurt the UK with said missiles if you could get them close enough, hit seats of government, power plants, I don’t believe that it’d be sufficient to take the UK out of the fight, and then you’d be in a fight with an opponent who has more force projection capability than you do who is at a range that you can’t easily hit them at; not a favorable situation. Not to mention NATO.
Russia’s military is crippled and they’d have to get through NATO. China likewise would have to get through NATO and I doubt they would have much of an interest in attacking the UK. However, the USA, if Trump woke up on the wrong side of the bed one morning, probably could. If anything, the USA might be the biggest threat.
I find it very difficult to believe Russia could resupply an invasion force, even if it could technically manage the initial push. I’ll have to read the article properly but the sea and air logistics involved, without invading every country between the UK and Russia, seem insurmountable.
They seem to be ignoring the possibility of war from within.
What possibility? I think the biggest threat is probably in Northern Ireland which isn’t even that big of a threat anymore as it was 30+ years ago
You mean a civil war? No chance, there isn’t really any wedge issue that anyone cares enough about for that to happen.
You’ve got general government incompetents but that’s nothing new.