“The appellant engaged in a premeditated and rather elaborate ruse in order to deceive the victims for his own sexual pleasure,” the judge ruled. “He violated their sexual integrity.”
  • kbal@fedia.io
    6·
    2 days ago

    You’re telling me it’s illegal to construct an elaborate ruse to deceptively persuade people to have sex with you? Makes sense I guess, but that’s not what I learned from every single 20th-century TV sitcom.