• Shawdow194@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    F16 > SU-35 officially!

    For years us war machine enthusiasts doing all the napkin math based on stats but now we have a track record

    Slava Ukraini!

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      it was an F-16A, too. even the most updated F-16A Block 15 aircraft are still just… from another era of aircraft entirely. the f-16 may now be demonstrating itself to be the plateau of combat aircraft as it outcompetes more up to date jets and drone combat changes what aerial combat even is. the F-22 and F-35 are more advanced, to be sure, but i’m more and more questioning if that means anything, or more, if that’s not actually a major design flaw in more modern craft

      • jonsnothere@beehaw.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        We’ll need to see in real life (and hopefully that doesn’t happen), but in theory an F35 would have fired at a 4(.5) Gen aircraft before it was even detected.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I do believe most western armies have gone a bit too far into “a few advanced” over “many simple”.

        If I’m going to war I would prefer to have 200 Leopard 2A4 with me over having 20 Leopard 2A8. Same goes for aircraft: I would rather have 100 F16 than 10 F35. If only because a realistic war has a long front, and those few pieces of advanced equipment can’t be everywhere at once.

        We shouldn’t forget that during WWII, the allies typically had the technologically inferior armour, but won out because it was easier to build and maintain, and they had more of it.

        • AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Both systems have a place. Your F-16’s, F-18’s are ‘fighters of the line’ while the 22 and 35 are more specialized aircraft for different missions.

          • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Oh, absolutely. The best option is of course to have enough of everything. However, the past 20 years we’ve seen a bunch of western militaries phase out a bunch of their older, simpler equipment in favour of a few high-tech systems.

            I think my point is that it may be a mistake to discard large volumes of older systems and replace them with a few new systems. If/when a war happens, we’re going to need large volumes of simpler gear as well as the few specialised and modern systems we’ve developed the past 20 years.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Is that early detection plane like the 3 or 4 A50s ukraine has destroyed that Russia only has a small handful of left?

    Edit: near the end of the article it says it’s like the Russians ones. Hope they can protect it, it’s going to be super valuable!

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      if these two recently damaged A50s were operational, then they’re down to 4 from 6 before (per Budanov, as announced after two A50s were shot down by first Patriot, then S200)