• Showroom7561
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 days ago

    $100k doesn’t even come close to covering the damage caused to those tenants.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Even with the fine, it’s still financially advantageous for the landlord. They’ll make that $100k back in about four years (accounting for taxes) given the extra $700 they’re pulling in per tenant. Then they’ll just make an extra $2800/month ad perpetuum. There really needs to be greater repercussions for actions like these.

      • Thassodar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        According to the article the parent company of the landlord was fined $25k and said it may bankrupt them.

        He could be bullshitting but if they go out of business whoever buys it next could be less shitty, but it’s unlikely.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    I am again shocked at this semblance of accountability. Would the victims get some of these fines or is that not the kind of case?