Somehow this is the only country on earth where this seems to happen. When talking about shootings involving guns, okay, fine, the US is certainly an outlier there, but every country has cars and police.

This is murder.

  • Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    330
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    So some neckbeard republicans are going to come out and say “She should have just complied”, but honestly what is the absolute worst scinerio if she WAS shop-lifting? In what world is it not a better option to just get her FUCKING CAR’S license-plate number, track her to her house, then arrest her there when she’s clearly cornered? Or just boot her car when it’s found again and force her to come to you to get it off?

    Because now you’ve killed a woman and her unborn baby over some God damn groceries.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      143
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      The headline “Pregnant lady caught shoplifting groceries; arrested” would already be telling of a society that has gone far over the edge.

    • sndmn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      98
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If this is a jurisdiction that says embryos are people then that cop executed a completely innocent person.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That would require logical consistency. I would never accuse a republican of such a thing.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Same exact neck beard republican bitching is bitching about the injustice of arresting the good boys for Jan 6th.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      What I want to do is make a satirical video game about complying perfectly with a police officer’s requests, and show just how hard it is.

      Throw in mixups where the player might be confronted by armed criminals, just to make sure players instill themselves with a sense of self-preservation.

    • KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      The argument will be that she was trying to use her car as a deadly weapon because she accelerated into an officer standing in front of the car.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which falls apart when you watch the cops body cam footage and see that never even happened

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or, you could deal with the issue when and where it arises? Seriously, some of the commenters here are trying to rewrite history.

      She drove at a police officer dude.

      • Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        She drove away from a police officer who intentionally stepped out in front of the car.

        Also that’s some grade a level hypocrisy right there.

        • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sorry, I’m just gonna repeat that for the folks in the back…

          NONCOMPLIANCE SHOULDN’T MEAN EXECUTION BY FIRING SQUAD

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        10 months ago

        I pretty sure she drove her car into a wall because she was bleeding to death. I don’t think that was really a decision.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Probably thought they were going to kill her anyway, since cops be doing that on the regular.

      • tryingtimes@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        she should have just complied,

        I’m surprised there isn’t an automod bot to filter out cliche comments exactly like this

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        If she was trying to run him over, she did a really shitty job. The cop put himself in front of the vehicle and she turned her steering wheel the wrong direction and didn’t slam the accelerator. I think if anything the cop was trying to be run over, not the other way around.

        • Compactor9679@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          Its not about “doing a good job” or not. She had the intent. Its all it takes for an officer or even a person to defend themselfs

          • Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’re not getting it. He wasn’t trying to defend himself, he was intentionally putting himself in a place of danger to justify murder in the name of defense.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            She clearly did not have intent. The cop just placed himself in front of the car. If he wasn’t there she still would have driven forward. She didn’t drive forward because he was there. It wasn’t intent to run him over, it was intent to flee. The cop had intent to be in the cars path though.

          • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I thought it wasn’t about her shoplifting? Make up your mind.

            Oh, I’m sorry. It’s not about any of that, is it? It’s just about whatever you need to excuse a government agent murdering an American citizen without a proper trial by jury.

            Do us all a favor and never pretend you respect the United States Constitution ever again.

      • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You can clearly see her turn the wheel away from the officer, and she doesn’t slam on the gas, she just accelerates at a normal speed. Not that that matters to you, you just love jacking off to pigs murdering people and don’t want to question for one second how shoplifting and resisting arrest is supposed to justify murder

  • cowpowered@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    202
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    The hell is wrong with this country. Shoplifting is not violent crime. If they flee put out an arrest warrant and they’ll turn up later, in a lot more trouble.

    Cops are well aware standing in front of a car gives them a free pass killing someone who attempts to escape. It’s totally unnecessary pointless murder.

    • OutlierBlue
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      142
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s totally unnecessary pointless murder.

      It’s an execution. Someone accused of a crime doesn’t get a trial or a chance to defend themselves. Someone with a gun makes a decision to end their life on the spot.

    • Boddhisatva@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cops are well aware standing in front of a car gives them a free pass killing someone who attempts to escape.

      Not to mention, standing in front of a car driven by a POC who has every reason to expect the cops to shoot them anyway. That person is already frightened and likely panicked and not thinking clearly. Putting yourself in front of a car with a panicked driver who is justifiably in fear for their life is incredibly stupid.

      Also, what is with cops just repeating the same command over and over again and refusing to otherwise interact with the person. Are they trying to make the situation worse? Why not try and de-escalate the situation. Oh, that’s right, they want a reason to shoot people.

    • experbia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cops are well aware standing in front of a car gives them a free pass killing someone

      This “technique” has been demonstrated enough that frankly, I think that any rational person would conclude that in any situation where a cop walks in front of your car, you’re better off just gunning it before the cop has a chance to extrajudicially execute you first. If they walk in front of your car, it’s clear they’re just itching to murder you. The threat has been made, you should fear for your life. It’s you or them.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        41
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think that any rational person would conclude that in any situation where a cop walks in front of your car, you’re better off just gunning it before the cop has a chance to extrajudicially execute you first.

        Who upvotes this crap? This is worse than reddit.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Debate it.

          Running from police in a high crime area used to be considered probable cause.

          That’s changing now because running from police in a high crime area is an eminently reasonable thing to do even if you’re innocent.

          If the tactic is demonstrably employed as a pretextual justification to kill nonviolent criminal suspects, than it’s reasonable to say that statutory law of resisting arrest should be the thing that breaks, not the natural law of self defense.

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            35
            ·
            10 months ago

            You want me to debate against someone saying you should floor it any time police walk in front of your car??

        • jimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I can’t think of any other reason for a cop to place himself in front of a car. It’s dangerous and it’s not going to stop a car. It really only can be to provide an excuse for deadly force.

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            So every time a cop steps in front of someone’s car they’re planning on executing them…

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            37
            ·
            10 months ago

            If you floor it and run into a cop just because they walk in front of your car, you deserve to get shot because the cop would be defending themselves.

            • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              34
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              If dude’s aiming a gun at my face cause of some groceries?? He deserves what he gets.

              Maybe try de-escalating instead of over-escalating. In NO situation should a suspected shoplifting end in a murder.

              If she tried to run, guess what? They can literally just track her down and move to arrest when lives aren’t in danger.

              He unnecessarily and intentionally put himself in harm’s way, in an intense situation with a terrified suspect. He knew what he was doing.

              Fuck off with your tyrant apologia bullshit.

  • Envis10n@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    195
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    To anyone saying she tried to run over the officer, please watch the body cam footage. She is turning the wheel as much as possible to steer the vehicle away from the officer. On top of that, she pulled forward very slowly. If you were trying to run someone over, you would not give them every opportunity to avoid being hit by the vehicle.

    Stop licking boots

  • Thurgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I do not understand why it is so common for police in this country to stand in front of a car and then shoot the driver when the car moves. It’s a manufactured danger and really does not seem like a smart idea to use your weapon to put a corpse in control of a heavy machine.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s not to understand? Their goal is the expression of power, the suspect’s escape is completely non optional to them. They are not trained in de-escalation.

      So, by placing their body on the line (in the path of the giant metal machine), they are essentially saying “obey me, or you are willing to kill me if you try to escape”. So if you try to escape, you are willing to kill them. So if you are willing to kill them, they are free to defend themselves.

      It is crazy, but consistent logic.

      Remember they aren’t there to help, or protect, but to enforce.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      They stand in front so that they can shoot the driver.

      You can’t play chicken with someone and then shoot them if you get scared. You have to either swerve or get hit, that’s why it’s called chicken.

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You do understand why. What you said is exactly why. They are manufacturing a danger so that they are legally allowed to use lethal force against anyone for any small crime. All the police do in the USA is escalate, escalate, escalate

  • ox0r@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Getting shot over shoplifting is insane.

    The usa is fucked beyond saving

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    American fascists continue to prove their belief that property damage isn’t an acceptable response to murder, but murder is an acceptable response to property damage.

  • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Woman scared for her life because officers immediately pointed guns at her for no reason is proven correct when killed by officers for no reason. Just another day in America. Cops just love pulling their guns and using them for no good reason. The only time a cop should be pointing a gun at someone like this is if their life is in immediate danger from that person.

    How would society feel if these weren’t cops? If a guy just runs up to your car pointing a pistol at your head you aren’t going to be calm and rational. It’s bullshit we expect anyone to be.

    • alp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can’t justify her running from the cops, that was wrong but no where near as wrong as killing her for doing so

      • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, I kinda can. We’ve all seen too many videos where police officers pull people out of cars in these situations, she was pregnant… People of color end up dead on the ground outside of that car even if they did nothing wrong, all the time. Even more commonly they get thrown around and beaten. Pregnant woman don’t normally want to get thrown around or beaten.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I want to posit first that this is a satirical answer, and I am not encouraging this in the slightest, just that this might be the “cornered logic” equation that is given to suspects being confronted by police:

            Plan B: You whip out a pistol you bought from the gun store, shoot all of the cops that are about to shoot you, and drive off to go live in a different state so it’s hard to follow you.

            I would hope and predict that most people committing petty crimes like shoplifting or drugs would not want to hurt anyone, much less a cop, but when that is THE ONLY answer you can give that has a strong chance of survival in the face of the articles everyone has seen, it begs the need for a different answer - one in which there is ZERO chance of a cop killing an unarmed person for petty crime, and attempted evasion of arrest for said petty crime.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Uhh no I can 100% justify running from cops. Some of them are totally unhinged with a total lack of accountability.

      • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        This incident is exactly why that’s justified. Her life was in danger, that cop was clearly itching for a reason to kill her or he wouldn’t have stepped in front of the car. She ran because it was probably her best chance of not getting killed

      • RobMyBot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        When the police are increasingly known and proven to kill people for next to no reason at all, it’s quite difficult to blame a person for being afraid of them when confronted.

        • alp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Your best chance regardless of race or economic status is to comply so they don’t get hot headed, not to mention its the legally correct thing to do

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      10 months ago

      when killed by officers for no reason

      Besides trying to run one of them over, you mean? Kinda leaving out some details here.

  • phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    How should this have been handles instead? If she really really doesn’t want to comply, You write down her license place, and you let her go.

    That simple.

    You have her face on video, you have the license plate, it’s trivial to then go visit her at her home and have a talk. Hell, follow her if you have to, but not in a high speed chase. Just keep your distance, let her go where she wants to go until she’s done.

    Worst case scenario, you just let her go.

    This extreme focus on that every petty little thing MUST be stopped, every small time offender MUST comply only ends in this. Suffering.

    Instead focus on fixing poverty and you know, making sure that pregnant women have all they need so that they don’t need to steal? That is why we banned abortion, no? Because we care about babies?

    Oh yeah that’s right. We care about unborn fetuses, but born babies can get fucked.

    Let this woman have an abortion if she can’t afford a baby. Now she doesn’t need to shoplift, at least not for the baby

    Lift people out of poverty. Push people to be better educated. THOSE are things that will actually lower crime rates but then it means they ml o longer are the common pulp that can stand on

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      force your representatives to finally vote this into law.

      Lol. We’d have to vote for new reps. And as soon as we do, the ruling class just spends more money on campaigns to make sure we don’t get any power.

  • Eggyhead@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, could he not just have taken the license plate number then sent agents to go knock on her door later? This is shoplifting, not armed robbery.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    As the fetus is now legally a person and did nothing wrong the officer who fired the shots should be arrested for homicide.

    • MisterD
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      10 months ago

      So double murder and illegal abortion too.

    • shapis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If it’s not obvious those rules are in place to punish women. Not to protect. They will never ever be applied in a protective way. That’s not what they were made for.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is this where society is heading? Rampant theft resolved with murder to save corporations?

    To them, this probably sounds easier than lowering prices, reducing CEO’s millions in pay and propping up stock prices.

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The governor of Florida and presidential hopeful said looters will be shot on sight. So no, it’s not where we’re headed because we’ve passed that destination and it’s normal. Property is firmly above people.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s a reason why Militech and Arasaka are the biggest players in the cyberpunk rpg universe. Once corporatocracy reigns supreme and public funding is gone they reap profits off private security, as intended. We’re just now seeing the horizon of “defund the police” becoming “hire a PMC as your ‘police force’”

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        10 months ago

        this may surprise you, but the police started out as PMC union-busting operations

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Oh lol I’m totally aware. There was a time in history where striking didn’t mean you’d be fired but instead fired upon. Just sucks to see it now coming back full circle

      • LukeMedia@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Reminds me of the news in cyberpunk 2077 telling how “warning shots to the knee” became legal for police

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes. To get back to normality, we must pass through this extreme, which is the necessary counter to defunding and demonizing the police as opposed to holding only the bad ones responsible for their actions. We’ll be in this state until we remove qualified immunity. So it will probably take a while.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh yeah, sure, they increase prices because of “theft.” They’re honest corporations who would never increase prices for another reason like greed or price gouging.

  • bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s fucking horrible.

    First off, I wish they would show the full uncut raw footage. People need to see the reality of getting shot.

    Second, he literally just pulls the gun out and says “get out of the car.” Like, what the fuck man? Get out of the car or I’m going to shoot you? For stealing from a fucking kroger? One of the biggest businesses in the US?

    Dude. This is bullshit. He needs criminal charges.