• nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 days ago

    Reminder: the Internet has its roots from ARPANET which is designed to survive an atomic blast and openly available to learn. A dead web business model won’t kill the technology that allows humans to instantly communicate. If anything a new internet may come of this once the money dries up.

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 days ago

    The zero click searches just haven’t been monetized yet. Don’t worry they are working on it

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      Totino’s Pizza Rolls remind you AI makes mistakes, always double check important information. [AD]

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      It was around that time when we started making people visit the same 5-10 sites. Facebook virus indeed.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Google is in an interesting predicament. Their ad service brings in so much revenue, but it’s based on search sending traffic to places where those ads are consumed.

    Boost search through Overviews and you’re limiting the effectiveness and reach of your ad service. And to top it off, your search needs content to ingest and remain relevant. But if the ad revenue drops off to websites, they go out of business, so search has less stuff to ingest.

    It’s like a reverse flywheel, where each part is working to harm the other part. People have been pointing this out for the last couple of years, but Google search just keeps adding more to Overviews and choking off the flow.

    And before you say “good, I hate ads,” most of the internet today and its services are paid by ad revenue changing hands. That includes ISPs that host the Fediverse, networking and storage gear makers, pretty much everything to do with open source, and so many jobs that exist to keep the whole thing humming so we can enjoy cat memes.

    If Google (or someone like Cloudflare) doesn’t figure out a way to keep the money flowing, we may be watching a sea shift in how the internet has worked in the last 30 years.

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think Google can never really hope to disrupt itself. The entire company is oriented towards selling those ads. So any other internal division that tries to eliminate the ads division is going to have a very uphill battle.

      IMO the industry is ripening for disruption and someone will come along with a new idea for how to incentivize content generation and it will very likely continue to involve some heavy commercial marketing.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        yea they need those ads, youtube ads bring in around 37bn for the platform in ad revenue.

  • 4k93n2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    duckduckgo added the “instant answers” sidebar for the first time back in 2014 and google did the same not too long after, so its definitely not a new issue

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Dinghy exactly. The CEO is whining about something nobody wanted, that’s maybe going to go away, and someone gets upset at you saying so? Makes no sense

        • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          The wording you chose did not adequately reflect that you were referring to the CEO.

          Rather, it sounds like you are criticizing the OP for sharing an article you do not understand or agree with, as it invited no discourse and only served to criticize, similar to the comments regularly posted below news articles.

          I do agree fully with you that CEOs rarely do work of any value, and their role is basically to siphon money from an organization like the parasites they are.