“A republic, if you can keep it.”

  • Rose@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Given its in-court defense of Google, Mozilla is clearly complicit and its products should be boycotted. It’s a shame it’s the only alternative to Chromium, but I’m perfectly fine with the US government cracking down on Google, no matter the consequences for Firefox. The monopoly must be disrupted for the benefit of every internet user.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it’s so great for Privacy, why does it support DNS over HTTPS?

    Taking name resolution control away from the user and the OS is NOT a benefit to your privacy. Especially since bad actors can and do exploit DNS for data exfiltration.

    (And yes, you can disable it… FOR NOW.)

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If it’s so great for Privacy, why does it support DNS over HTTPS?

      DNS queries can be and are logged by public WiFi access points and ISPs. DoH cannot.

      Taking name resolution control away from the user and the OS is NOT a benefit to your privacy.

      It doesn’t take anything away. It’s just a default. If you don’t want DoH, then just turn it off.

      (And yes, you can disable it… FOR NOW.)

      So you’re okay with the current situation and are complaining about some hypothetical future that you are theorizing might materialize?