After the Trump assassination attempt, someone joked “Doesn’t the shooter know you have to aim for a vital organ” or something like that. Comment got removed. But what was odd was the reason given for the removal. It just said “abelism”.
That moment when I ask a question that gives rule enforcers the benefit of the doubt thinking they might not be singling me out with how they treat me before they give dishonest reasoning, and someone with absolutely no previous interactive history answers my question implying how the rule enforcers have treated me really is the oddest thing in the archives. Glad to know other people see through their inconsistency.
