• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Honestly this is probably a better use of the land than growing lettuce in a freaking desert. The water situation in California isn’t getting better

    • Mycatiskai
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wonder if you could gather water from the solar panels cooling at night and having moisture on them from condensation. If they had a hydrophobic coating, the water would always run to the bottom which could then be caught in a tube structure to carry the water into a cistern to water the plants that are growing in the non-panel covered areas of the farm.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I believe there have been experiments growing crops under panels. The effect you speak of and the fact that panels, when they have no backing, are translucent can be good for some plants.

        Harvesting under structures is difficult though.

        • Sonori@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It’s effects tend to very based on plant and local conditions, but typically the point of agrivoltaics is to shade plants in hot, dry climates around midday to improve yield. At low angles sunlight goes around the panels, but at peak sun they are shaded.

    • ticho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Sooner or later, people will get confused and we’ll end up with a crop of solarbeans. :)