• m-p{3}
    shield
    MA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Please label links to french articles with the “french” language next time.

    EDIT: Those who downvoted, any explanation as to why?

      • m-p{3}MA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Preferably, this allow users to only see posts in languages they want to see (which is why it’s often recommended to keep “Undetermined” enabled for the language, as it’s not “mandatory” to label posts at the moment.)

        • setVeryLoud(true);
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That makes sense!

          I think you got downvoted because your original comment made it sound like you were singling out this post for linking to a French article, but I agree we should tag all posts with the appropriate language, English or French.

          As a bilingual instance, I think mandatory labeling of post language should be considered.

  • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That’s a non sequitur. “We can’t trust the US” doesn’t mean “we need nukes” and it doesn’t mean “we need spooks” either.

    • TotallyHuman
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      You might disagree with the argument, but it’s not completely random. From the US, we gained most of the benefits of having nukes and spooks, without having to maintain them ourselves. Since we can’t trust them, we now have to decide if it’s worth developing our own.

    • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ukraine has shown that any country that wishes to stay sovereign needs nukes. Trump’s rhetoric around the “51st” State further proves the need.

  • Rob Bos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Either that, or we’re the only ones who are GOOD at it.

    • cygnus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Our spooks are so good even our own government doesn’t know they exist!

      • Rob Bos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sounds like a Murdoch Mysteries plot. Terence Myers establishes a top secret spy org financed through the Maple Syrup Reserve…

  • n2burns
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think your title meant to say, “Canada is the only G7 countries without a foreign intelligence agency.”

  • Jay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does CSIS not exist anymore?

    • deeferg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The way I understand CSIS is it’s more focused on tracking online actions, akin to chats plotting terrorism. I dont think they focus on actual bodies in other countries or tracking other country activities.

  • casmael@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hear it’s pretty easy these days, you just gotta ask to join the group chat and then you’ll be in the loop and stuff. Just gotta remember to ask about new secret activities because they like to have a new group chat sometimes eg “hey are you guys planning any covert black ops atm be sweet if you could add me to the chat” and they’ll be like “sure are you still on the same number” and there you go

    • BCsven
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Haha, I had a similar situation. Our chat app had a message from our IT about installing an app that tracks location and state of computer, but without the normal corporate memo first. Just a “hey please install from this link”.

      So I said " How do I know this is not a phishing scam".

      The reply was “it’s real, its’s me ITguyname”.

      Me: “How do I know its the real ITGuyname and not an imposter.”

      Itguyname: “Because I’m standing up”

      So I knew it was our IT guy by that joke, but there could still be a chance it wasn’t. How is it a random dude is more suspicious of supposed chat connections that the US government.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh wow really? I thought you guys had one the entire time.

    I feel like there’s a meme to be made on this…